1
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,338 Given: 5,110 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,875 Given: 2,197 |
It could be from the slaves or merchants in the Viking era.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,690 Given: 1,855 |
Perhaps slaves taken by Vikings under Bjorn and his campaigns in the East. Was not an uncommon thing. They did trade with the Islamic empires at the time. So merchants also aren’t out of the question.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,673 Given: 882 |
Seems like an inaccurate map, Y-DNA studies on Danes show 0% J1, like the one posted on Eupedia.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,690 Given: 1,855 |
Eupedia isn’t exactly a source of gospel truth. Sometimes there tends to be agenda/bias. For instance Albanians have the highest V13, and for the longest they were ignoring to include their clades in the tree. Also went so far as to say it’s mostly due to Slavs and Celts. So I wouldn’t trust Eupedia 100percent.
Russian data for example
http://генофонд.рф/?page_id=5629
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,673 Given: 882 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,690 Given: 1,855 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,673 Given: 882 |
Yes ofc, I still don't trust all of the studies to be 100% accurate but atleast he's putting forward the sources used. I'm talking of this page btw https://www.eupedia.com/europe/europ...logroups.shtml
He maybe has a thing for you Albanians but I can't see why the numbers for Denmark to be inaccurate.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 44,378 Given: 31,164 |
maybe Jews.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks