Page 2 of 52 FirstFirst 12345612 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 514

Thread: Your thoughts on the Ottoman Empire?

  1. #11
    Veteran Member Ushtari's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Last Online
    02-11-2014 @ 07:16 AM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Illyrian
    Ethnicity
    Albanian
    Ancestry
    Dardania
    Country
    Kosovo
    Gender
    Posts
    4,508
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 105
    Given: 1

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Марко Краљевић View Post
    As for the apricity's resident imperialist comments aimed at Serbs as durable Ottoman soldiers, entire Janissary elite corps were from non muslims, preferable Balkan Christians, who were taken as children to Istanbul through "taxation in blood" and made into elite soldiers who would fight and die for sultan.
    Ottoman please...

    A known Grand vizier(second highest rank in the empire), is the Serb Mehmed-paša Sokolović. He had big influence in the ottoman empire, meaning the enemies of the ottomans must have been his enemies to, right?

    Kosovo polje, 1389. The Serb Marko Kraljevic, allied with the Turks against Christians. Also, the battle of nicopolis, were the Serb Stefan Lazerovic with his forces were allied with the Sultan Beyazid, against catholics. Also, in the second battle of Kosovo(1448), skenderbeg moved to join the Hungarian coalition but they were intercepted and attacked by the Ottoman vassal Đurađ Branković of Serbia, and delayed from reaching the battlefield. Skanderbeg and his army ravaged Branković's land to punish Serbs for desertion of Christian cause.
    http://books.google.com/books?id=0Sz...senate&f=false

  2. #12
    Inactive Account Loddfafner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last Online
    07-08-2012 @ 11:21 PM
    Location
    Back East
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Celtogermanic
    Ethnicity
    European Blood, American Soil
    Ancestry
    Barbarians the Romans couldn't handle
    Country
    United States
    Region
    Philadelphia
    Politics
    Tradition and improvisation
    Religion
    Heathen
    Gender
    Posts
    4,249
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 33
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Actually, there was considerable manufacturing throughout the Ottoman Empire, and historians have argued that the industrial revolution might have taken off based in Bursa had Manchester not gotten there first.

  3. #13
    Veteran Member Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"


    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    ..
    Country
    Brazil
    Gender
    Posts
    14,330
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,538
    Given: 1,428

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    The fall of Constantinople which paved the way for Ottoman rule of the Balkans. The shadow of Ottoman rule even continue to be pervasive today with Islamist Bosnians and Albanians who work everyday to undermine Christianity in the Balkans.

    Before the Ottomans came we had three strong European states in the Balkans and that were the Serbian, Bulgarian and Byzantine empires (Byzantine Empire would have later become an ethnocentric state of the Greeks had it not fell). The Balkans was never fragmented as it is today and 99% of the fragmentation that exists today is the consequence of allowing the Ottomans to rule us for 500 years.



    An example of how nice and neat the Balkans used to be before it got all messed up by the Ottomans. Obviously most of Greece that were occupied by us should be handed back to the Byzantine Empire and Dalmatia to Serbia. And we've got a perfect non-fragmented Balkans but no, we don't have that today, thanks to the Ottomans.

    The 500 years of Ottoman rule brought on a population growth decline of Balkan ethnics. The population total of the Greeks during the Byzantine period was about 5 million and today the population of Greece? Ten million. The population of Greeks in Europe grew by only five million over a period of 500 years. To compare, Turkey grew from 20 million in 1920 to 75 million today. Serbia's population during the medieval period was about 2 to 3 million and today we're at 7 million in the Balkans. We grew only 4 million over 500 years. Undoubtedly the Ottomans' rule was the primary cause for such slow growth.

    We were also denied a lot of indigenous European cultural growth and replaced for a Central Asian, Turkish one. Natural evolutions of a European culture always occur over a period of a couple hundred years but no, we were suppressed for 500 years and thus retarded our cultural growth to an amalgamation of Ottoman and Serbian cultural growth instead with the Serbian portion severely crippled due to the repressive Islamic society that was the Ottoman Empire.

    The Gypsy migration from India to Europe is also one of the boons of the Ottoman Empire. If it wasn't for the Ottomans, the Gypsies that now terrorize much of Southeastern Europe would not be even here today. Such migration of Indians was only a preview of what we see today in London, Paris and Berlin. If we want to see how such migration of a non-European people will look like after 500 years then look no further than the Balkans. Granted, the amount of non-Europeans that have migrated to Western Europe are much larger and have migrated more quickly than the Gypsies ever did but they do provide us with a good idea of what to expect.

    All in all, the Ottoman Empire was very damaging to Europe, the Balkans specifically. Unfortunately, it is a damage that is largely irreversible today however we can always try to eliminate most of it by deporting Gypsies and Muslims to the hellhole that is Turkey.


  4. #14
    Veteran Member Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"


    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    ..
    Country
    Brazil
    Gender
    Posts
    14,330
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,538
    Given: 1,428

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ushtari View Post
    Ottoman please...

    A known Grand vizier(second highest rank in the empire), is the Serb Mehmed-paša Sokolović. He had big influence in the ottoman empire, meaning the enemies of the ottomans must have been his enemies to, right?

    Kosovo polje, 1389. The Serb Marko Kraljevic, allied with the Turks against Christians. Also, the battle of nicopolis, were the Serb Stefan Lazerovic with his forces were allied with the Sultan Beyazid, against catholics. Also, in the second battle of Kosovo(1448), skenderbeg moved to join the Hungarian coalition but they were intercepted and attacked by the Ottoman vassal Đurađ Branković of Serbia, and delayed from reaching the battlefield. Skanderbeg and his army ravaged Branković's land to punish Serbs for desertion of Christian cause.
    http://books.google.com/books?id=0Sz...senate&f=false
    Oh please... you're going to pick select traitors and then claim that as evidence that we are Turk lovers? At least today we are not even close to a Muslim state whereas 80% of Albania is Muslim, 99% of Kosovo Muslim and all of Albanians in FYROM are also Muslim. Now fuck off.


  5. #15
    Veteran Member Ushtari's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Last Online
    02-11-2014 @ 07:16 AM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Illyrian
    Ethnicity
    Albanian
    Ancestry
    Dardania
    Country
    Kosovo
    Gender
    Posts
    4,508
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 105
    Given: 1

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Serbian lies seem to have got to new levels, not that strange considering lying is a part of these neo-turks identity(see signature).



    Quote Originally Posted by Forget Me Not View Post
    The fall of Constantinople which paved the way for Ottoman rule of the Balkans. The shadow of Ottoman rule even continue to be pervasive today with Islamist Bosnians and Albanians who work everyday to undermine Christianity in the Balkans.
    The only kind of religious terrorism/radicalism that exists in todays Balkan is the Serbian Orhodox Christian one, whos clerics openly support genocide on non-serb and blessed their soldies/terrorists before they executed 8000 Bosnians in Srebenica, all in the name of Orthodox Christianism.

    The Balkans was never fragmented as it is today and 99% of the fragmentation that exists today is the consequence of allowing the Ottomans to rule us for 500 years.
    No, the fragmention that exist today in Balkan is due to Serbian terrorism.


    We grew only 4 million over 500 years. Undoubtedly the Ottomans' rule was the primary cause for such slow growth.
    Like in war times, Serbs have also showed themselfs to be incapable of reproducing themself. Serbia have one of the fastest declining population in europe, also given the fact that Serbia also have one of the oldest populations in the world where the majority of the Serb womens have reached infertile age. So they are doomed to be extinct, wich of course is a great thing for peace in the Balkans.


    We were also denied a lot of indigenous European cultural growth and replaced for a Central Asian, Turkish one. Natural evolutions of a European culture always occur over a period of a couple hundred years but no, we were suppressed for 500 years and thus retarded our cultural growth to an amalgamation of Ottoman and Serbian cultural growth instead with the Serbian portion severely crippled due to the repressive Islamic society that was the Ottoman Empire.
    The Orthodox church was shining during ottoman empire and orthodox people even had a own millet where they could preach their religion freely, unlike Catholics who where the main enemy of the ottoman empire.

    The Gypsy migration from India to Europe is also one of the boons of the Ottoman Empire. If it wasn't for the Ottomans, the Gypsies that now terrorize much of Southeastern Europe would not be even here today. Such migration of Indians was only a preview of what we see today in London, Paris and Berlin. If we want to see how such migration of a non-European people will look like after 500 years then look no further than the Balkans. Granted, the amount of non-Europeans that have migrated to Western Europe are much larger and have migrated more quickly than the Gypsies ever did but they do provide us with a good idea of what to expect.
    Gypsies, apart from Serbs have shown themself to be able to reproduce themself and do soon make up 10% of the sebian population. They will most probably be in majority in a near future, so what do you think we should name Serbia? i go for "Republika u Magjupsku i Srbiju".


    All in all, the Ottoman Empire was very damaging to Europe and the Balkans specifically. Unfortunately, it is a damage that is largely irreversible today however we can always try to eliminate most of it by deporting Gypsies and Muslims to the hellhole that is Turkey.
    Indeed, you Serbo-Turkish hybrids need to be expelled back to your homelands.

  6. #16
    Veteran Member The Lawspeaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Last Online
    11-05-2023 @ 04:45 AM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Celto-Germanic
    Ethnicity
    Dutch
    Ancestry
    Brabant, Holland, Guelders and some Hainaut.
    Country
    Netherlands
    Politics
    Norway Deal-NEXIT, Dutch Realm Atlanticist, Habsburg Legitimist
    Religion
    Sedevacantist
    Relationship Status
    Engaged
    Age
    36
    Gender
    Posts
    70,127
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 34,729
    Given: 61,129

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    The thing is, Ushtari, you are not even European. And the same goes for you, Joe. I am more inclined to believe the Serbs here because they are.



    Wake up and smell the coffee.


  7. #17
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Last Online
    07-23-2012 @ 02:57 AM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-Saxon
    Country
    United States
    Politics
    Conservative
    Gender
    Posts
    7,558
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 54
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Loddfafner View Post
    Actually, there was considerable manufacturing throughout the Ottoman Empire, and historians have argued that the industrial revolution might have taken off based in Bursa had Manchester not gotten there first.
    True, though interestingly enough this seemed to be least centered in the European portion of the empire, one would assume due to that region being such a source for their elite warrior class.

  8. #18
    gone Monolith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    12-03-2011 @ 11:29 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    human
    Ethnicity
    .
    Religion
    .
    Gender
    Posts
    1,457
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 11
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ushtari View Post
    A known Grand vizier(second highest rank in the empire), is the Serb Mehmed-paša Sokolović. He had big influence in the ottoman empire, meaning the enemies of the ottomans must have been his enemies to, right?
    Yes. The Ottoman society was a mixture of worst imaginable tyranny and democracy, so virtually anyone could become a Grand vizier or even a sultan.

    My opinion about the Ottoman empire is very negative, since they ruined the medieval Croatian kingdom; demographically, culturally, politically and economically. Also, constant warfare against them as well as several centuries of occupation of some Croatian regions produced a series of awful cultural traits (mostly mentality) that, rather sadly, linger among the Croats to this day.

  9. #19
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Last Online
    06-28-2012 @ 10:22 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    ...
    Ethnicity
    Pred. Austrian, Serbian
    Ancestry
    Austria, Serbia, Poland, Sweden
    Taxonomy
    Northdick
    Politics
    Silesia Je Moravia
    Gender
    Posts
    1,654
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 20
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Under Ottoman rule, Serbs were not allowed to read, write, own property and even forbidden to use musical instruments. The Gusle player is so important to Serbs because the Guslar was the only one who carried on the cultural traditions and folklore of the Serbs. Many Guslars had their eyes taken out as a result of defying the laws.

    So for a Serb to call someone a turk is like calling them a philistine/brute/ugly person all in one word.

  10. #20
    gone Monolith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last Online
    12-03-2011 @ 11:29 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    human
    Ethnicity
    .
    Religion
    .
    Gender
    Posts
    1,457
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 11
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Forget Me Not
    Obviously most of Greece that were occupied by us should be handed back to the Byzantine Empire and Dalmatia to Serbia.
    Only in your wet dreams. What is now Dalmatia used to be Croatia in the strict sense, with the bulk of Croatian population living there. It was the seat of Croatian kings like three hundred years before medieval Serbian kingdom came into being. You would do well to at least partially educate yourself before posting such crap.

Page 2 of 52 FirstFirst 12345612 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. If the Balkans never came under Ottoman rule
    By poiuytrewq0987 in forum History
    Replies: 105
    Last Post: 04-11-2013, 08:00 PM
  2. The return of the Ottoman yoke
    By Beorn in forum Race and Society
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-26-2011, 12:55 PM
  3. Any thoughts on this very odd nose?
    By Eldritch in forum Taxonomy
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 11-25-2010, 09:38 PM
  4. Ottoman Rule in the Balkans
    By Electronic God-Man in forum The Bookshelf: Articles & Ebooks
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-29-2009, 01:54 AM
  5. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-13-2009, 08:44 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •