Meat eaters are destroying the planet says report

**Dandelion** · 07-26-2018, 06:32 PM

Originally Posted by Gold-Shekel

Meat or anything else, we're too many to feed ourselves without harming the environment. These anti-Meat lobbies are usually Soy companies which aren't much better.

Well, not convinced. You can't raise lifestock without feeding them feed from crops, for which you need even more land and transport costs. It's obvious that meat is more harmful for the environment.

**~~Profileid~~** · 07-26-2018, 06:32 PM

Originally Posted by Doggerman

It's obvious we're overdue another world war to knock back the rampant 3rd world over population (including China and India).

Let's all go at it.

China is at least managed its population. The biggest problem is African countries.Avg woman in Niger has like 7 children and the country is almost entirely desert.
They will be running out of resources soon and where will they go?

**~~Taiguaitiaoghyrmmumin~~** · 07-26-2018, 06:38 PM

Originally Posted by Profileid

China is at least managed its population. The biggest problem is African countries.Avg woman in Niger has like 7 children and the country is almost entirely desert.
They will be running out of resources soon and where will they go?

The problem isnt that have 7 kids in africa. The problem is that they under sell their natural resources to foreigners and they dont allocate their money smartly. And theres alot of political corruption. Because europe would not live so comfortably off without africa in todays economy. All the electronic components depend on minerals that are majorily found in africa. You wouldnt have an iphon3 without trade in africa or any computers And in north africa, france makes a killing off of uraniam.

**frankhammer** · 07-26-2018, 06:39 PM

Originally Posted by Taiguaitiaoghyrmmumin

Europe is over populated. Europe is smaller than the united states and is more populated than the united states.

Europe as a whole is a relatively large area. I'm guessing you're talking the western and central region. It still doesn't change much. Whitey is roughly 16-18% of the worlds population. The issue in my blue eyes are the other mongrels out there. We don't need "them" "here".

Most of the diversity being lost due to cropping and farming is not in Europe.

**~~Taiguaitiaoghyrmmumin~~** · 07-26-2018, 06:51 PM

Originally Posted by Doggerman

Europe as a whole is a relatively large area. I'm guessing you're talking the western and central region. It still doesn't change much. Whitey is roughly 16-18% of the worlds population. The issue in my blue eyes are the other mongrels out there. We don't need "them" "here".

Most of the diversity being lost due to cropping and farming is not in Europe.

16 -18 percent is alot. Is that including canada, austrailia, new zealand. Latin american countries like argentina uruguay where theres a sizable white population? Or south brazil?

Also since middle easterners are basically tanned white people shouldnt it be higher? And add caucus people since they are white?

**Óttar** · 07-26-2018, 07:00 PM

Africans have that old school mentality that they're poor, so if they have 10 kids one of them will strike it rich and feed everyone else. Family planning is the answer. If you can't feed them, don't breed them. I don't see the necessity of having more than 2 kids tbh.

**~~Profileid~~** · 07-26-2018, 07:14 PM

Originally Posted by Taiguaitiaoghyrmmumin

The problem isnt that have 7 kids in africa. The problem is that they under sell their natural resources to foreigners and they dont allocate their money smartly. And theres alot of political corruption. Because europe would not live so comfortably off without africa in todays economy. All the electronic components depend on minerals that are majorily found in africa. You wouldnt have an iphon3 without trade in africa or any computers And in north africa, france makes a killing off of uraniam.

This is Niger. Guess what? The land can't support an exploding population.

**~~Taiguaitiaoghyrmmumin~~** · 07-26-2018, 07:19 PM

Also europe is close to the land mass of the united states except that many parts of scandanavia are probably empty spaces of snow and ice bergs. Yet europe is basically twice the population of the united states. Add in the fact that the united states population is actually more diverse and real whites in the united states is actually lower than the total population. Compared to europe which isnt so diverse. Yet europe is way over populated. When compared to the US.
The population of all nordic countries is roughly only the population of texas. Implying most of main europe is a clusterfuck and more densely populated than the United states. And really if you got rid of scandanavia it would still be way more over populated than the united states and.

Scandanavia landmass 1,322,710 Square kilometers

Europeis 10,180,000square kilometers

United states landmass 9,833,000 square kilometers

Population of scandos
27 million

Population of all of europe
741.4million

Population of united states
325.7million