Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 29

Thread: Mexican takeover of the USA

  1. #11
    Bogdan
    Guest

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    I don’t see a problem. I’d much rather go back to Europe and be among my own people. There is where I would have problems with foreign immigration by non-Europeans. Modern Mexicans are related to the stock that created the Native American tribes in some way. I see what attracted my ancestors to this land but it is not ours. Times have been great here but in the end we colonized it semi-recently and I feel connection to my own land.

  2. #12
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Last Online
    06-23-2021 @ 06:41 AM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    EM78GREENSAVANNAH's best friend
    Ethnicity
    Bessarabian Jew
    Country
    Israel
    Region
    Aboriginal
    Y-DNA
    g2a1
    mtDNA
    h1
    Gender
    Posts
    6,561
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 8,158
    Given: 4,510

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teutone View Post
    There is a legal takeover too by the way higher birthrate and americans complain abiout that
    Well those Americans are dumb. Just like the Germans who complain of Turks - they don't realize that Mexicans/Turks keep to themselves for the most part, and do not inter-mingle with Americans/Germans to a large extent.

  3. #13
    Veteran Member
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Teutone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Athlete
    Country
    Palestine
    Y-DNA
    I1-Z58
    mtDNA
    J1c1
    Politics
    Would not call myself pro-semitic
    Hero
    Jozef Tiso
    Religion
    Catholic Christian
    Gender
    Posts
    21,959
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 26,888
    Given: 16,895

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Krieger View Post
    I don’t see a problem. I’d much rather go back to Europe and be among my own people. There is where I would have problems with foreign immigration by non-Europeans. Modern Mexicans are related to the stock that created the Native American tribes in some way. I see what attracted my ancestors to this land but it is not ours. Times have been great here but in the end we colonized it semi-recently and I feel connection to my own land.
    Hmm no thanks we dont want you guys back

  4. #14
    Veteran Member
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Teutone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Athlete
    Country
    Palestine
    Y-DNA
    I1-Z58
    mtDNA
    J1c1
    Politics
    Would not call myself pro-semitic
    Hero
    Jozef Tiso
    Religion
    Catholic Christian
    Gender
    Posts
    21,959
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 26,888
    Given: 16,895

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dragan Ciobanu View Post
    Well those Americans are dumb. Just like the Germans who complain of Turks - they don't realize that Mexican/Turks keep to themselves for the most part, and do not inter-mingle with Americans/Germans to a large extent.
    Germany was a ethnostate for several thousand years, it is reasonable for Germans that dont want to accept the model the USA forced upon us and be a nation of immigrants

  5. #15
    Veteran Member
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"


    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Travelling
    Ethnicity
    American
    Ancestry
    Colonial Virginia + Central and Eastern Europe
    Country
    United States
    Region
    Mississippi
    Politics
    Nullifier
    Hero
    John C. Calhoun
    Age
    98
    Gender
    Posts
    29,562
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 21,120
    Given: 11,131

    2 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teutone View Post
    Your nation was created by freemasons who have the longterm goal of a completly globalized planet with the USA as example

    That was not the goal of the Founding Fathers. Emma Lazarus was a late nineteenth century Jewish leftist whose poem does not represent their idea of what our country should be. She was more interested in bringing in Jews from Eastern Europe than in what benefited real Americans.

  6. #16
    Veteran Member
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Teutone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Athlete
    Country
    Palestine
    Y-DNA
    I1-Z58
    mtDNA
    J1c1
    Politics
    Would not call myself pro-semitic
    Hero
    Jozef Tiso
    Religion
    Catholic Christian
    Gender
    Posts
    21,959
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 26,888
    Given: 16,895

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Smeagol View Post
    That was not the goal of the Founding Fathers. Emma Lazarus was a late nineteenth century jewish leftist whose poem does not represent their idea of what our country should be. She was more interested in bringing in Jews from Eastern Europe than in what benefited real Americans.
    Founding Fathers were Freemasons and Freemasons naturally are on the side of the JEWS

  7. #17
    Veteran Member
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"


    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Travelling
    Ethnicity
    American
    Ancestry
    Colonial Virginia + Central and Eastern Europe
    Country
    United States
    Region
    Mississippi
    Politics
    Nullifier
    Hero
    John C. Calhoun
    Age
    98
    Gender
    Posts
    29,562
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 21,120
    Given: 11,131

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teutone View Post
    Founding Fathers were Freemasons and Freemasons naturally are on the side of the JEWS
    Some Founding Fathers were Freemasons but most were not. Benjamin Franklin was one of them and he wanted to limit Jewish influence in the newly formed country. The Founding Fathers also didn't want the country to involve itself in European affairs, and we didn't in any major way until World War I.

  8. #18
    Veteran Member
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Teutone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Athlete
    Country
    Palestine
    Y-DNA
    I1-Z58
    mtDNA
    J1c1
    Politics
    Would not call myself pro-semitic
    Hero
    Jozef Tiso
    Religion
    Catholic Christian
    Gender
    Posts
    21,959
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 26,888
    Given: 16,895

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Smeagol View Post
    Some Founding Fathers were Freemasons but most were not. Benjamin Franklin was one of them and he wanted to limit Jewish influence in the newly formed country. The Founding Fathers also didn't want the country to involve itself in European affairs, and we didn't in any major way until World War I.
    Well why you started it with ww1

  9. #19
    Senior Member Gwydion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Last Online
    09-03-2020 @ 09:03 PM
    Location
    Hyperborea
    Ethnicity
    Vinlander
    Ancestry
    England, Deutschland, Eire, Nederland
    Country
    United States
    Y-DNA
    R-Z49
    Taxonomy
    Nordid-Cromagnid
    Religion
    Gnosis
    Gender
    Posts
    579
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 597
    Given: 461

    2 Not allowed!

    Default

    As noted, many of the founding fathers had racialist sentiment in their writings. Benjamin Franklin stated that the whole world was "tawny" and he wished to see the "white and red" (fair skin with rosy cheeks, etc.) flourish in this land. The Decleration of Independence has the line, "Secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity", namely the nation was intended for the descendants of the founding stock and/or related peoples which was reflected in the 1790 Naturalization Act which restricted citizenship to white Europeans of good character. Obviously it is also well known that initially only land owning white males were allowed to vote.

    Hence the original intention of the founding fathers and early American state was for the nation to be an ethnically European one, not one which anyone could come and be an American.

    Regarding Mexico. John C. Calhoun, speech on Mexico (January 4, 1848) when there was contemplation of annexing Mexico:

    The next reason assigned is, that either holding Mexico as a province, or incorporating her into the Union, would be unprecedented by any example in our history. We have conquered many of the neighboring tribes of Indians, but we have never thought of holding them in subjection, or of incorporating them into our Union. They have been left as an independent people in the midst of us, or have been driven back into the forests. Nor have we ever incorporated into the Union any but the Caucasian race. To incorporate Mexico, would be the first departure of the kind; for more than half of its population are pure Indians, and by far the larger portion of the residue mixed blood. I protest against the incorporation of such a people. Ours is the Government of the white man. The great misfortune of what was formerly Spanish America, is to be traced to the fatal error of placing the colored race on an equality with the white. That error destroyed the social arrangement which formed the basis of their society. This error we have wholly escaped; the Brazilians, formerly a province of Portugal, have escaped also, to a considerable extent, and they and we are the only people of this continent who have made revolutions without anarchy. And yet, with this example before them, and our uniform practice, there are those among us who talk about erecting these Mexicans into territorial Governments, and placing them on an equality with the people of these States. I utterly protest against the project.

    It wasn't until the 1950s/60s that segregation began to end and until 1965 that the gates were opened for anyone in the world to come here. The people who engineered these changes are in direct opposition to all which preceded them, which is always amusing when you hear their modern ideological descendants (leftists) talk about their values being "American" values.

  10. #20
    Veteran Member
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"


    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Travelling
    Ethnicity
    American
    Ancestry
    Colonial Virginia + Central and Eastern Europe
    Country
    United States
    Region
    Mississippi
    Politics
    Nullifier
    Hero
    John C. Calhoun
    Age
    98
    Gender
    Posts
    29,562
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 21,120
    Given: 11,131

    2 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teutone View Post
    Well why you started it with ww1
    Because Woodrow Wilson got us into it after promising he wouldn't. It's all been downhill since then.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Serbian Re-Takeover of Kosovo by Births
    By Albobalboa in forum Kosova
    Replies: 49
    Last Post: 06-18-2018, 02:14 AM
  2. Globalist Takeover At UK DailyMail?
    By wvwvw in forum News Articles
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-10-2018, 06:36 PM
  3. Is Goldman Sachs Poised To Takeover Europe?
    By The Lawspeaker in forum Economics
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-02-2011, 10:53 AM
  4. The Cloud: Trojan Horse For Internet Takeover
    By European blood in forum Computers and Internet
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-18-2011, 01:44 AM
  5. EU takeover and the Lisbon Treaty (2008)
    By Sol Invictus in forum Conspiracies
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-08-2009, 11:36 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •