Why are indian men the least wanted??

[tipirneni]

While you subhumans spread canards about English educated South Asians, last 20 years huge number of places are experiencing population replacement problems and many villages are starting to go off the map. Whereas South Asia, East Asia, West Asia & SE Asia are exploding with new villages double values of lost villages.

[Faklon]

What exactly was the Indus Valley Civilization then? Afghans have some ancestry from them and tons of Bactria-Margian Complex ancestry as well. Both were highly developed agrarian societies.

Iranian farmers were Anatolian Neolithic+1/3 ASI/Dravinian and Indus Valley farmers were half Anatolian Neolithic+half ASI.



As it is also interesting to observe, Anatolian Neolithic is the purest Caucasoid component.

In West Eurasia,





And Greece is not some "White"-Mia Khalifa mix like you said in a previous post just because OWD anthrotards spam the same 5-10 pictures for the last 10 years.

Here you can see 225 high quality (mostly group) pictures from a carnival last year.

https://gr.depositphotos.com/stock-p...tml?offset=100

There is a dominant local element, call it med or whatever that looks very different to:

1. These Swedes/Germanics



2. These Syrians



When these Afghans look pretty much alien,



Which by extend is a predominately Anatolian Neolithic type and used to be the phenotype of the dominant West Eurasian civilization till ~500 years ago.



Unfortunately we are forgetting our values. When in Rome, do as the Romans do.

[Faklon]

You mean gtfo out of my lawn . Lol. Sure man. I'm in Greece right now aren't I ?

Gett the fuck outta my lawn.

Bother to learn the language of your host country, I'm not a native speaker.

[Faklon]

europeans are thinking that gypsies are the way they are because of that 20% mix from 'subhuman' like indians.

I didn't tell you to receive gypsies back, for better or worse they are part of our country. There is however a phenotypical similarity (or if you want proximity) and both groups struggle to integrate.

[Bandesha]

I've already made several posts and even a thread on here regarding gypsies and their treatment. I defended them several times and I even posted charts regarding their IQ and their comparison with Irish travelers IQ being roughly the same and their situation right now has to do with them being ill treated and closed off from balkans than anything else. I dont wanna be redundant. I actually defend gypsies quite a bit actually.

my argument with avicenna wasnt regarding him talking about gypsies or greek or whatever. its none of my concern. I was just wondering in general based on his posts ever since he joined this forum.

welcome back boy , strangely i missed you

i just want to know , same day you joined i am getting messages from my friends about a troll on anthrogencia, pleae tell me its not you as someone is obsessed with me and posing as me for quite a few time and my spies are investigating the matter , so i wanted to ask you in advance

[Thambi]

welcome back boy , strangely i missed you

i just want to know , same day you joined i am getting messages from my friends about a troll on anthrogencia, pleae tell me its not you as someone is obsessed with me and posing as me for quite a few time and my spies are investigating the matter , so i wanted to ask you in advance

thanks man.

bro I got banned from AG the same day I left this place. You can ask the mods if that sock account's profile matches with mine in any way. I have never made a sock account anywhere on anthroforums. On AG, AS, or TA. I'm dead honest regarding that.

[NPKTO]

Iranian farmers were Anatolian Neolithic+1/3 ASI/Dravinian and Indus Valley farmers were half Anatolian Neolithic+half ASI.

Doesn't make sense. Only later Iranian farmers (Seh Gabi, Hajji Firuz, Tepe Hissar) had Anatolian Neolithic and they didn't have 1/3 AASI. Earlier samples from Ganj Dareh lacked Anatolia Neolithic ancestry. IVC didn't have Anatolian Neolithic because it was derived from population source close to Ganj Dareh farmers. Iran Neolithic (Ganj Dareh) is not related to Anatolia Neolithic and vice versa. Other than they both had hypothetical Basal Eurasian population that contributed to them, they're not similar at all. However, Levant Neolithic and Anatolian Neolithic were very much related to each other. Levant Neolithic just had more input from Ancient North Africans (Iberomaurusian/Taforalt).

[Faklon]

Doesn't make sense. Only later Iranian farmers (Seh Gabi, Hajji Firuz, Tepe Hissar) had Anatolian Neolithic and they didn't have 1/3 AASI. Earlier samples from Ganj Dareh lacked Anatolia Neolithic ancestry. IVC didn't have Anatolian Neolithic because it was derived from population source close to Ganj Dareh farmers. Iran Neolithic (Ganj Dareh) is not related to Anatolia Neolithic and vice versa. Other than they both had hypothetical Basal Eurasian population that contributed to them, they're not similar at all. However, Levant Neolithic and Anatolian Neolithic were very much related to each other. Levant Neolithic just had more input from Ancient North Africans (Iberomaurusian/Taforalt).

Check the maps above, you are just using different names for similar components. Yes, Levant Neolithic is basically Anatolian Neolithic with some North African input.

[NPKTO]

Check the maps above, you are just using different names for similar components. Yes, Levant Neolithic is basically Anatolian Neolithic with some North African input.

I think you might've misinterpreted the Iran N and IVC pca. IVC is ANF deficient. Same goes for Ganj Dareh. And yes Ganj Dareh is shifted towards AASI because it has some AASI, but it's minimal. If this map is based on Laziridis Dzudzuana paper, we still gotta wait for the paper to come out. The tone of his paper suggests Iran Neolithic could be Anatolia N with Siberian (ANE) admixture & some ENA (Eastern Non-African aka AASI).

[Faklon]

I think you might've misinterpreted the Iran N and IVC pca. IVC is ANF deficient. Same goes for Ganj Dareh. And yes Ganj Dareh is shifted towards AASI because it has some AASI, but it's minimal. If this map is based on Laziridis Dzudzuana paper, we still gotta wait for the paper to come out. The tone of his paper suggests Iran Neolithic could be Anatolia N with Siberian (ANE) admixture & some ENA (Eastern Non-African aka AASI).

It's a combination of older studies. ANE already shifts towards AASI in relation to Anatolian Neolithic, seems like you are playing with relative components to me when the conclusion is similar.