Do you agree with my thought?

[Roflmao]

It's actually pretty hard to judge objectively given that the history of Europe and mankind in general is almost always one of competition and rivalry.

Sure the the first half of the XXth Century saw many progress in technology and such, but at the same time this competition led to 2 catastrophic wars (yeah we can blame the jews and such for the 2 world wars, but in the end it happens because tensions between the European and others nations existed.)

Personally I would rather have a peaceful world and slower technological progress than a world in a permanent state of war which would maybe result in many technological advancement.

Also think about it: Negroes were at war among each other during all their "history" (if we can call what happened in most of africa before the colonial era history) yet never managed to invent the wheel. So competition is not the guarantee that your civilization will be prosperous.

That say, i'm not for globalism or even pan-europeanism though, as they are ultimately project to benefit only some people , and that I don't want to see niggers, gooks, muhammadan, pajeet, wetbacks and others weird people in my neighborhood for purely cosmetic reason.

[Thorns]

Interesting, I very rarely see or hear people mention Austrian economics (of which I advocate).

Most people don't seem to realize how interventions have distorted things over the years, and incorrectly understand the problems, and the potential solutions.

[Daugakrit]

I agree that competition is necessary for healthy development of both people and nations, but war is an unfortunate byproduct of petty principles and greed. Honestly, I'd rather compete with other Europeans in a healthy manner while the fools spill blood amongst themselves over in MENA and etc. Violence should be carried out only in self defense, be it territorial or ideological.

Edit: Checked the date and it appears that we have a new Bobby clone.

[cyberlorian]

Do you agree with my thought: Competition and rivalry resulted in more achievements than cooperation and friendship?

All of the great technological and civilization-related achievements came trough war and competition between great powers

Because the possibility to not keep up to date with your enemies and try to become stronger in all kind of aspects could quickly end up with you being invaded.

I think the conflicts and multiple ethnicities made the European race so superior in combat and lead to us colonize most of this planet.

Therefor globalism or Pan-Europeanism are totally counter productive.

Actually it depends on how we define friendship. I believe, two or more nations can be friends of each other but also rivals of each other. In my opinion, rivalry is not all was being friends. Yes, competition and rivalry brings success but I do not think friendship would decrease it.

[Duffmannn]

Most important inventions in the XX century were possible thanks to IIWW and Cold War.

[The Blade]

Competition leads to improvement in every sphere.

[Joso]

lol nope.
Europe would not be anything without that well known people that didn't even originate from there...
Everything good Europe has is thanks to them.
And trying to connect the Austrian school with Nationalist ideas is totally contradictory, btw.

[Gründig]

lol nope.
Europe would not be anything without that well known people that didn't even originate from there...
Everything good Europe has is thanks to them.
And trying to connect the Austrian school with Nationalist ideas is totally contradictory, btw.

Who might this be?

[Joso]

Who might this be?

Take a guess.

[Gründig]

Take a guess.

?