0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 219 Given: 36 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 152 Given: 156 |
I hope you understand English
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitola_inscription
"The inscription was found in SR Macedonia, then part of SFR Yugoslavia, where for political reasons any direct link between the Cometopuli and the First Bulgarian Empire was denied.[25] Originally exhibited in the local museum, the stone was locked away in 1970, after Bulgarian scientists took a footprint and published a book on the inscription. Immediately after this publication, a big Bulgarian-Yugoslav political scandal arose. The museum director was fired for letting such a mistake happen.[26] After the collapse of Yugoslavia, the stone was re-exposed in the medieval section of the museum, but without any explanation about its text.[27] The historical and political importance of the inscription was the reason for another controversial event in the Republic of Macedonia in 2006 when the French consulate in Bitola sponsored and prepared a tourist catalogue of the town. It was printed with the entire text of the inscription on its front cover, with the word Bulgarian clearly visible on it. News about that had spread prior to the official presentation of the catalogue and was a cause for confusion among the officials of the Bitola municipality. The French consulate was warned, the printing of the new catalogue was stopped and the photo on the cover was changed.[28]"
Now the proof that it's fake?
Thumbs Up |
Received: 219 Given: 36 |
We have never had an opportunity formally to write our own history so our neighbors did it for us, and included us in their national history. The others referenced them and they had a choice to describe us as Bulgarians, Serbs or Greeks. Few of the others made their own research and said that we are and we were Macedonians. The main problem arrived when we formally started to write our own history, that made Bulgarians and Greeks angry and the others confused.
Now are copying Wikipedia as a proof.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 219 Given: 36 |
-Invictus- you are mad man
Thumbs Up |
Received: 152 Given: 156 |
Dude, I'm just being objective. Sorry if I'm too direct. You can identify as Macedonian and have your own country. I have no problem with that. Some Bulgarians and Greeks don't like you because you try to claim the regional history as Macedonian national history that doesn't have anything in common with Bulgarian or Greek history. Most obvious examples are the 2 statues in the center of Skopje - Alexander the Great and Tsar Samuil. Let's put the Bitola inscription aside for a moment( even though you claim it's fake and bring zero evidence to back up that claim ). Just answer to these 2 questions please :
1. Why archeological evidence from the capital of ancient Macedonia show Doric Greek writings? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pella_curse_tablet How are Greeks stealing history from you if ancient Macedonian writings are in Greek? How are Greeks stealing history from you if the empire of Alexander was culturally Greek?
2. How is the kingdom of Samuil Macedonian if it's a part of the First Bulgarian Kingdom? You can check why Ohrid became the capital. It's not because it was a Macedonian kingdom, but because Bulgaria was weakened and lost it's eastern territories to Byzantium after the constant attacks from Kievan Rus. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sviatoslav_I_of_Kiev "...also spelled Svyatoslav, was a Grand Prince of Kiev[2][3] famous for his persistent campaigns in the east and south, which precipitated the collapse of two great powers of Eastern Europe, Khazaria and the First Bulgarian Empire. " "While Sviatoslav's campaign brought no tangible results for the Rus', it weakened the Bulgarian statehood and left it vulnerable to the attacks of Basil the Bulgar-Slayer four decades later." Basil II is also mentioned here and there is no mystery in why he was called Bulgar-Slayer and not Macedon-Slayer.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 348 Given: 1,896 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks