0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,319 Given: 427 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 13 Given: 4 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,243 Given: 2,623 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 52,721 Given: 43,621 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 13 Given: 4 |
they consider themselves french therefore they are french. if they're not french because of surnames or something, neither are north croats who's surnames are closer to slovenia than the rest of Croatia
before you started being shitty like you always are, you could have just said "no"
Thumbs Up |
Received: 13 Given: 4 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 52,721 Given: 43,621 |
They are ethnically Italian and their genetics is central Italian like with Sardinian like input.
North Croats have never been Slovenian, while Corsicans have been Italian for centuries. I just dislike you because I don't buy that you are a Croat. No Croat would even compare Corsicans with north Croats, lmao.if they're not french because of surnames or something, neither are north croats who's surnames are closer to slovenia than the rest of Croatia
before you started being shitty like you always are, you could have just said "no"
As for islanders, I am half that and both my parents are also. Our genetics is usual, which would be expected to anyone knowing history of the islands.
So far we encountered one genetic outlier on Ugljan (who seems fully Croat by origin and plots close to north Italians) who may be Illyrian remnant or simply have unknown Venetian input, but that is just one sample.
Based on my sharing with Dalmatians on 23andme who have locations of all 4 grandparents listed, islanders get more eastern Europe and less Balkan than people from hinterland do, as a rule.
In ancestry composition I mean, but for accurate conclusions I'd need to see their gedmatch, which I did not.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks