Social Darwinism is Natural Selection Misunderstood

[Breedingvariety]

Yes, but one could argue that the destruction of many European lineages is a good thing - it is intense evolution, those unwilling to have children being weeded out at unprecedented rates in modern history. The European Europid race could emerge from this era stronger than ever before...

Lineages unwilling to reproduce have always been weeded out. The very existence of lineages is contingent on reproduction. So to say not having children strengthens a race is a fallacy, because it eliminates possibility of race being weakened. And by such logic, the strongest race would be the race that stopped reproducing and gone extinct.

Consequently, the white race must now evolve itself to be more compassionate and cooperative - simply being a scientist or technical professional is no longer enough, since, as we see, many of those people are genetically inclined to be quite self-absorbed..

What are you definitions of:
-compassionate
-cooperative
-self-absorbed

I don't see scientist being self-absorbed. And especially not genetically.

Besides, genetics doesn't determine profession.

Your views seem illogical.

[GeistFaust]

Lineages unwilling to reproduce have always been weeded out. The very existence of lineages is contingent on reproduction. So to say not having children strengthens a race is a fallacy, because it eliminates possibility of race being weakened. And by such logic, the strongest race would be the race that stopped reproducing and gone extinct.

What are you definitions of:
-compassionate
-cooperative
-self-absorbed

I don't see scientist being self-absorbed. And especially not genetically.

Besides, genetics doesn't determine profession.

Your views seem illogical.

I agree with you breeding variety when we differentiate social perspectives from the natural order of things this only does us justice in so far as we remain realist about the human condition. Reproduction is necessary for our existence so likewise having a subconscious desire to do the same is natural. At the same time this subconscious desire to reproduce coincides or collaborates with a competitive instinct. The will to survive is a very keen instinct that is driven by forces that are much deeper then what science can understand. When one race is far advanced or more developed then another it would not seem right naturally to try to give oneself over to social concepts which try to be politically correct about things. It is not a matter of hurting feelings when someone just does not have what it takes to survive under certain conditions without the aid of another person. Natural Selection at its c core desires to produce the best of the best but this will not always be the case there are always going to be glitches and errors. The glitches and errors subsequently get rid of themselves because they lack a connection with that internal instinct which is so necessary to actually be inclined to survive.

Compassion is fine under the right conditions but naturally we are "shaped" to be compassionate because we have this internal need to survive. Compassion is secondary to survival and this will always be the case. Nature is cruel and not compassionate. It is also very unpredictable and the nature of unpredictably naturally causes a certain amount of angst or a one sided edginess which subconsciously drives fit humans on to survive. This one sided edginess makes humans feel a need to be competitive and it is competition which has led to the strongest gene pools and to the most advanced cultures. Conflict and competition are driving forces in keeping nature strong externally and internally its almost like a spiritual force.

That is what I hate about all these politically correct institutions trying to introduce social norms which might appear to be good or moral but which in actuality will only produce further evil and immoral activity. It is just a plain lack of responsibility and it is producing a generation of losers who have forgotten how to compete. This is why we have become sissified in the West we no longer have to go out fight for our survival as if death was imminent but rather we just take things for granted and we are fine with free hand outs. Compassion and Kindness are good as long as they are kept in check we need more of spirit and conflict this is the natural instinct which is imbued in every healthy individual.

Competition is something that just coexist with our the will to live if we are not in conflict with ourselves and others to a certain extent there is usually something wrong with us. I think we have forgotten how primitive and savage we are in essence and how these primordial instincts tend to impulse us to do everything we can to keep ourselves in existence. A certain amount of edginess is natural because it is necessary in order for existence to continue onwards in future generations. Modern Society and a lot of the Social understanding of evolution have greatly undermined both the competitive spirit of mankind and his natural instinct to survive. Its time we let take nature take care of itself and naturally eliminate the unfit elements that arise from it. And it is our duty to try to preserve nature and produce the best specimens possible this desire should only be natural.

[Curtis24]

which should know better, but don't act, do nothing for stopping this contraselection

Somebody posted a link to this in the chatbox. But seriously... what is there to do??? Nobody knows what to do, that's the problem. We're helpless.

[Curtis24]

This is why we have become sissified in the West we no longer have to go out fight for our survival as if death was imminent but rather we just take things for granted and we are fine with free hand outs.

Well, I disagree with this. The problem is the opposite - most young Westerners lack social ethic and are too selfish. They have become too brutal.

[Joe McCarthy]

I touch on this subject here:

http://www.westernrevival.org/ethnic_darwinism.htm

[KeinMitleid]

Social Darwinism is natural. Science backs it up, I'm sorry. And plus, its mere common sense. Why should we invest time in the inferior organisms when we can focus on the ones that will be productive?? This hearkens back to the Judeo-Christian spiritual disease which has established an idiocracy in essentially all human societies. We cannot allow the weak to poison our gene pool anymore. We cannot allow the inferior stock to continue replicating!!

[Teutone]

up

[Arsen_]

I may sound somewhat cynical but it is obvious that such a huge amount of biped tailless monkeys that have flooded this small planet is just outrageous and absolutely pointless.

In the foreseeable future a drastic depopulation of this planet will happen in any case and regardless of our desires. And the only question is whether this process will be more or less streamlined and regulated in a relatively reasonable way, or whether it will take place in the form of terribly destructive world wars with an unprecedented scale of casualties and losses, or in the form of colossal natural and technological disasters, massive total epidemics of a biblical scale and so on and so forth.