2
A bit behind with this thread, but my initial thoughts
1) Yes perhaps. But some people are better at creativity and innovating, and others at maintaining and improving. You need both types. I don’t think it’s a bad thing to have different countries as predominantly one type in character, and I think being an innovator is great.
2) So other countries are really good at sports we invented? To me that’s a good thing, we’ve created sports others love. Also you want competition, something to aim for. It would be boring to be the best at everything all the time. And we have won world cups or gold medals in various sports, so I think that’s hardly failing. We are also into several sports. New Zealand is mostly into rugby, effort is more focussed.
3) I think it’s hard to learn a foreign language when your first language is English. You have to go out of your way to be exposed to the different language as you’ll never see it in films etc. Many Americans will be more exposed to Spanish than the English will be to another language.
As for Europeans and welsh speakers speaking other foreign languages besides English, studies have shown that once you have learned one foreign language it is much easier to learn another one. Some language courses have trialled teaching Esperanto for 6 months before getting onto the target language, as Esperanto is easy and very regular, but having learned it means later language learning is sped up.
With regard to welsh people speaking welsh, Irish speaking Irish etc. I suspect people who have issues with this feel that the welsh or Irish see themselves as superior because they can speak what the English speaker can’t, and this makes these people feel insecure. The more secure of us don’t care.
4) I think the English media has just shown ordinary English people, and because the media has been quite successful others have seen it more and so see it as ‘the norm’. As you said elsewhere, the English aren’t known for being insecure in their ethnicity, so they would have no need to promote anything. Their only crime is being themselves and successful.
5) I don’t know what to say about this one. I see other countries with private healthcare etc whereas we are still mostly public. We were pretty broke in the 70s, so maybe it’s just a consequence of selling things off to try to raise funds. I’m more pro public ownership where possible.
6) Perhaps they are trying to make it more relevant to ordinary school kids. Teach a council estate kid about slavery and Nazi Germany and you’re teaching them not to be racist, not to treat different ethnicities differently, and the potential atrocities that can come from voting for the racist far right. Life skills and important lessons for their lives.
Teach a council estate kid about Ireland, India, Australia or North America and you teach them not to try to be a power hungry member of the elite who wants to take over another country and impose your culture on them. I doubt many ordinary kids have global domination in their life plan. Plus if you don’t want to encourage arrogance, perhaps don’t teach them how dominant England/Britain once was.
I am being devil’s advocate about all these things. To an extent yes, English people don’t try so hard to learn languages because they know everyone will speak theirs. And no, we don’t get taught every detail of English history in school (though if we did just focus on ourselves we’d probably be called too Anglo-centric).
Bookmarks