Bolshevik Origins

[The Lawspeaker]

The Bolsheviks laid the foundation for the most bloody and totalitarian movement in the last 100 years. Strangely, their origins are denied and suppressed. Find out how and why this takes place in this video.

Source: https://www.rockingphilosophy.com/20...k-origins.html

[The Lawspeaker]

Karl Marx, a dangerous idealist who would do anything to get what he wanted.

Socialism, Communism, Marxism – what’s the difference?

Source: http://www.rockingphilosophy.com/201...communism.html

[Hexachordia]

In the west no serious writers and thinkers try to face to its reality. On the contrary, most of them choose to sympathize it, when I try to understand them by reading their books, they give no earnest explanation, just replicate marxist propaganda formulae: the worker interest, democracy, most oftenly anti-imperialism of their own countries, nothing showing their true color. Curiously, both eastern and western leftists have an important common trait, lewdness with female, many of them are sexually aggressive toward women. Don`t laugh, this is no joke.

The corruption of all marxist system is as obvious as ulcer not cancer, it therefore is curious why the west has been silent about this fact. George Orwell is not really touching the reality of soviets, just a light cariculturization. Marxist is not an idealist, he is the arch-antagonist of idealism, he is rather a sub-realist or nihilist. He did not write das kapital out of concern for progress, but he just copy-pasted some old materials from autocratic legacies from some unknown sources which mostly have ancient old-tastament and chinese classical references. We over-mystified marxism by putting it as a part of moden transcendentalist movement, it is not. It is nothing it claims to be, not science, not atheism, not democracy, not progress, not materialism, it is a pure sham, and there is no extent term to fully describe its elusiveness to all clear definitions we apply to verbal creations. Its propaganda plays on our most basic conception, perception of every object, every word, very notion, therefore it is purely stupid to argue with them, but people can be lured into self-deception under certain circumstances but never truly believe in it. No one ever believes in marxism, but the existing dilemma within each personality makes it vulnerable to be exploited by marxist manipulation. It must be an old system, if not older, as much old as democracy. Its ancient records were destroyed or never intented publicity, like many secret sect, only keeping the dogmas through ages for selected few. Mongols, hellenophobes(anti-greeks), anti-theism all have obvious common traits with communism, why not communism a legacy of ancient autocracy if democracy is rooted in ancient India, Mesopotamia, Greece?

To treat communism as an ancient system refurbished makes a lot of sense.

[The Lawspeaker]

I would say that it probably goes even deeper. It might be a good idea to unite the threads and clear out the muck. In its pure origins, it seems to have an occult basis - one that is utterly and completely devoid of any morality and has a deep contempt for human life. The Germans have a good word to describe such a sentimentt: "Menschenverachtend" (to have contempt for human beings), in Dutch I would refer to it as "zonder God noch Gebod" (without either God or (His) Law/Commandments). In other words: I would call it evil distilled to its purest essence.

Evil in the sense that it doesn't recognize neither morality, (Human) Nature, Natural Law, free will or God Himself. It's chaos for the sake of creating a new order where chaos reigns while any semblance of natural order is put down immediately (I refer here to the differences between the French and American Revolutions and also refer to the current state the West is in - which is, perhaps, a softer version of it).

[Hexachordia]

In its pure origins, it seems to have an occult basis - one that is utterly and completely devoid of any morality and has a deep contempt for human life. The Germans have a good word to describe such a sentimentt: "Menschenverachtend" (to have contempt for human beings), in Dutch I would refer to it as "zonder God noch Gebod" (without either God or (His) Law/Commandments). In other words: I would call it evil distilled to its purest essence.

I believe communism is the lesser evil, it is why we find it the most demonic. It has to do ourself as humans in society. Actually lies are requisite to communicate, half-truth(wkpdia) is arguably the greatest lie but it is also a sociological component in our life. Communism is purely the sum of human stupidity so far I am concerned. I think China has been dominated by communism since 2000BC, whence the earliest human sacrifice burials in China started. I infered a lot about communism based on that precondition, concluding benchmark traits of communist systems, predicting most of its future developments. You understand chinese history, you understand communism.

Rationalists insist that there is no evil or good, like Nietzche and Sir Russell, because the dilemma is rooted in human emotion not reality. I think their attitude is a correct way to face to the reality, which is too heavy to consider within idealism only, let alone a sub-reality like communism where people are enslaved to circumstances. In a short, we simply do not have much time for emotional breaks in our reality. Dealing with communism in earnesty, must be totally rational, it is an extremely difficult and important task, hatred is just little repose and an idealist temperament I do allow myself and people of it as long as it remains on papers.

Evil in the sense that it doesn't recognize neither morality, (Human) Nature, Natural Law, free will or God Himself. It's chaos for the sake of creating a new order where chaos reigns while any semblance of natural order is put down immediately (I refer here to the differences between the French and American Revolutions and also refer to the current state the West is in - which is, perhaps, a softer version of it).

Freedom is a just a shallow transcient surreality everywhere, I admit its frailty but do not deny its importance. The voids of reason, law, morals are a part of our(eastern and western) daily reality, it is sad but true. You western citizens are really lucky veinards. I am so glad I see some westerners honestly embracing their own good fortune.

[Hexachordia]

Some may even argue that lesser evil is the greater good, this is just pure rhetorics, having no realistic meaning. Once we stand by the ground that no pure evil or good, we are dealing with practical reality. By lesser evil I mean communist crimes are neither exceptional nor trivial, they are just being mediocre and stupid. Nihilism is the most suitable word to describe their whole existencem: pure stupidity. My words are confusing? the point is, look at reality, just look at it for some more time of your life, you will understand. The trick here is people themself never really care about anything, they are confused themself most times but they do not know they are in confused situation. And marxist virus takes advantage of it, and enslaves everyone.

I will be more than happy to share my memoire of communism in reflection, using this thread. Since I feel like alien to open a thread myself to talk about domestic mess here.
Thank you Lawspeaker.

[Hexachordia]

I would call it evil distilled to its purest essence.

Evil is in exact sense, when we have judge human beings under devine law, a part of greater goodness, for example: the honest villains are good people, like Robin Hood, crusaders, spanish conquistatores, debauchers like Lord Byron, bloody samurais, Francisco Franco, Savonarola etc. These people are the true evil, and they are also the true good people. Only good people can become evil. Parasites are filth, not evil, just filth. Communists are slaves can not be anything at all, they are filth at their worst, scum at best. We must not judge the scum.

[Hexachordia]

All they want from China is money. But communists are so stupid oftenly they claim too large a vest of honour(which the west does offer for money)for their next to nothingness essence. Such misplaced honor is the true insult to chinese people. Communist country is just plain and simple a land of primitive anarchy system, not even feudalism. Marx deliberately misled readers to think feudalism precedes capitalism, he puts so many wrong ideas into peoples mind. In fact, feudalism is still the foundamental ideology of modern democratic systems. Feudalism is as much advanced as democracy and capitalism. This is a tiny part of truth of the world.

[Hexachordia]

The balance of power between communist block and the west is also a joke, a pure joke, not even a superfacial decoy. The west has always been on the upper hand since 5000 years ago.There is no power balance, what the communist leaders talkng about balancing american imperialism on the east is pure laughingstock. They are native clowns from the very day they are born into their system, they are beyond medication huge, dirty, ugly clowns. No balancing USA, you primitive steppe yeomen.

[Hexachordia]

What is ideology? could people really choose to become what they want? Not really. Greek democracy was not new, but their citizenship was all that matter as a greek invention. We may call a system enforces legal equality as democracy with a senate. The trick of the greeks is how they define citizenship, and thus for the first time, claim the honor and serve the responsibility as a citizen. Greek democracy was virtually complete, it had all the elements of modern european administrative system. Because of this, as greek created a perfect democracy. This makes me reflect on the functions of ideological development, is there really a development, at least a linear development? If not, what we are tryng to revolutionize in the democratic system maybe a vanity, I do not mean being in vain, but just a form of fashion like the fashionable industry.

Can we really surpass Plato, even Aristotle in their philosophy, or we are just decorating them with new silk and jewels? The worst answer maybe that everything we think we can improve today is just a superfacial fashionable decoration of the ancient arts, the best answer is that even as fashionable designers, we are granted the right to do what we want however trivial things. So I advise never over-estimate the power of your own individual ingenuity, to underestimate yourself or not, it depends on your own personality problem, having nothing to do with othe others.