Romania Y-DNA similarity with neighboring countries

[Dacul]

How about "plimba ursu de aci cu propaganda slavica"?

[Dacul]

I2- Dinaric in Romania is the same as the one in the Slavic countries!
More specifically I-Y3120, https://www.yfull.com/tree/I-Y3120/ with TMRCA 2200 ybp!
Romanians have around 28% according Eupedia and it's of Slavic origin!

So what if Eupedia writes that should I believe it?
I am the one that told Maciamo that I would sue him because he wrote Romanians have lots of Slavic Y DNA.
He added later that I2-din might have been also spread by Thracians and Dacians. It seems that he got a little afraid of an eventual trial. If he was writin the truth, why he got afraid?
I did not even intended to sue Maciamo, I tricked that noob Belgian .
I2-a from Sardinia island, which is at less than 500 years from I2-din is still of Slavic origins?
Ken Nortvedt actually proved that I2-din appeared during Gothic migrations.
Is 2200 years old.
Is related to the wars that Dacians and some East Germanics fought against Kelts.
Dacians and East Germanics were allied people, but it seems they were speaking different languages. Anyway, the history mentions Dacians and Goths living together around 300 AD in Romania. Burebista is mentioned as Dacian king. But also as Gothic king. So it seems that Dacians and East Germanics lived together even in 200 BC.
Kelts did not left Dacia and Austria and so on willingly.
(not all migrated Westward, some remained and got assimilated )

[Aspar]

So what if Eupedia writes that should I believe it?

If you don't want to believe it than don't!
I don't really care.
At the end of the day you can lie to yourself that it's Dacian or East Germanic for all I care!
Yeah yeah I know, it can be Germanic, Italic, anything but not Slavic!
Those dirty Slavs!

[Hrvoje Vukčić Hrvatinić]

croats have highest i2 dinaric percentage in the world, not romanians, so if anything it is connected with us

[Ayetooey]

croats have highest i2 dinaric percentage in the world, not romanians, so if anything it is connected with us

Only in BIH Croats, who have nothing to do with medieval Croatia. North Croats are overwhelmingly R1a not I2a1b. I2a1b is found all over the Balkans, in mainland Greece, South Albania, Romania, Serbia, even in Crete. So you cannot claim ownership of it; unless Croats magically found their way all around Europe.

[Dacul]

How about Slavic people leave us Romanians alone, with their theories that we have Slavic DNA, because you know, this is Romania section of the forum?
Have I come to post in Serbia or Croatia or Bosnia or Ukraine or Czech Republic forums to tell that I2-din from there is related to Thracians?
I do not think so.
So, leave Romanians to post here.
I think the Romanian mate should have started to write in Romanian, to filter out Slavs from here.

[Aspirin]

How about Slavic people leave us Romanians alone, with their theories that we have Slavic DNA, because you know, this is Romania section of the forum?
Have I come to post in Serbia or Croatia or Bosnia or Ukraine or Czech Republic forums to tell that I2-din from there is related to Thracians?
I do not think so.
So, leave Romanians to post here.
I think the Romanian mate should have started to write in Romanian, to filter out Slavs from here.

It seems that this haplogroup could be brought by Slavs when they migrated from the North to the Balkans in 6-7th centuries. The big percent of I2a-Din in Romanians and Moldavians can be related to Vlach migrations in the Middle Ages from the Balkans, where they mixed with Slavs who come here, because in Romania the highest percent of this haplogroup is always found in mountain areas, the area who was populated mostly by Vlachs in the past, not Slavs. Even if this haplogroup was brought by Goths, still, the origin of this haplogroup is Northern Europe, not Balkans. All this situation is much more complicated, and needs more study.

[Dacul]

It seems that this haplogroup could be brought by Slavs when they migrated from the North to the Balkans in 6-7th centuries. The big percent of I2a-Din in Romanians and Moldavians can be related to Vlach migrations in the Middle Ages from the Balkans, where they mixed with Slavs who come here, because in Romania the highest percent of this haplogroup is always found in mountain areas, the area who was populated mostly by Vlachs in the past, not Slavs. Even if this haplogroup was brought by Goths, still, the origin of this haplogroup is Northern Europe, not Balkans. All this situation is much more complicated, and needs more study.

Yes, this is exactly what I have said.
How I think Thraco-Goths got Slavizied:
Thraco-Gothic males with more power and wealth took mostly Slavic wives.
Why that happened no one knows.
Normally, these males learned the language of their wives.
The people from under their rule learned also Slavic, after the language that their leaders were speaking.
Another thing is that there is no war recorded between East Germanics and Slavs.

[Hrvoje Vukčić Hrvatinić]

Only in BIH Croats, who have nothing to do with medieval Croatia. North Croats are overwhelmingly R1a not I2a1b. I2a1b is found all over the Balkans, in mainland Greece, South Albania, Romania, Serbia, even in Crete. So you cannot claim ownership of it; unless Croats magically found their way all around Europe.

bosnia was part of medieval croatia man, otherwise why do you think we have such fucked up shape today ? i found some data on i2-dinaric on croatian forums and it's most common haplogroup even in zagreb and slavonia

[Kelmendasi]

I2a-Y3120 certainly isn't Daco-Thracian. It's origin is in the area between Poland, Ukraine, and Belarus and it expanded from that region during the early Medieval. Clearly it has Slavic origin. It is likely that originally it's ancestral clade came from NW Europe and was carried by Germanic speakers. But it is certain that it was absorbed into the Slavic ethnos and expanded with them