Etruscan Pantheon

[jackrussell]

Matter of fact that this year alone more than 30 Albanian Turks killed in Syria/Iraq.



Maybe I should send Baybars , eh ?

[Antimatter]

Ugh no. Sumerians WERE Turks 100%.

[Antimatter]

You said it partner ; you are indeed a bigger fool than you think .

A Foolish Warrior is a more apt nick me thinks .



Your hubris duly noted .

Said the guy who claims Turks to be the progenitors of the world civilization. Osman Aslan, the great emperor of Turklar Rome (means Garden in ancient Turkic Sumerian) would have been very proud of you, you "Turanoid" genius.

[jackrussell]

Said the guy who claims Turks to be the progenitors of the world civilization. Osman Aslan, the great emperor of Turklar Rome (means Garden in ancient Turkic Sumerian) would have been very proud of you, you "Turanoid" genius.

Turks came from Moon , don't you know ?



I claimed Turks to be one of the oldest group of humans .

Progenitor is your interpretation of what I said .

I also never claimed the Turks to be neither First nor Unique in anything.... I merely pointed out that Turks are one of the OLDEST group of Humans.

I could have also pointed out the Adige River as an evidence of Circassian involvement in Etruscans too .

There is a problem with " official narrative " of History ; it is a known problem all around the World .

You feel free to go with the Official Narrative ; I'll go with the Narrative of the Oppressed .

[Antimatter]

I'll go with the Narrative of the Oppressed .

So if it has been done by poor oppressive people, it is automatically infallible and should be trusted by every member of Homo Sapiens? If the official narrative is a problem and it is acknowledged by most people, then the truthful "oppressed" narrative should have been much more popular. Yet you only see Turks claiming these ideas and myths.

Do you consider Sumerians Turks by the way? Just curious.

[jackrussell]

So if it has been done by poor oppressive people, it is automatically infallible and should be trusted by every member of Homo Sapiens? If the official narrative is a problem and it is acknowledged by most people, then the truthful "oppressed" narrative should have been much more popular. Yet you only see Turks claiming these ideas and myths.

Do you consider Sumerians Turks by the way? Just curious.

You make too many assumptions and presumptions in your inference .

Sumerians are connected to many tribes of Modern World [ Matrix ] and the etymology and antropology already points to this fact .

Turks are one of the group of people who claim Sumerian Connections , there are others too .

[MinervaItalica]

It is funny how this turned into a Turkish internal fight

Poor Etruscans, always been trolled on Anthro forums.

[Antimatter]

You make too many assumptions and presumptions in your inference .

I make too many assumptions/presumptions based on what is written by you.

You feel free to go with the Official Narrative ; I'll go with the Narrative of the Oppressed .

There are two choices here:

1-

if it has been done by poor oppressive people, it is automatically infallible and should be trusted by every member of Homo Sapiens

2- It's baseless and has no evidence of whatever is being mentioned. In this case you support the false narrative, perhaps for a multitude of reasons?

Sumerians are connected to many tribes of Modern World [ Matrix ] and the etymology and antropology already points to this fact . Turks are one of the group of people who claim Sumerian Connections , there are others too .

Had any connection been discovered between any modern-day peoples and ancient tribes it would be with peoples from Iraq/Iran/Syria region. Not from the Steppes. For instance, we know that the March Arabs are most likely the candidates of descendants of ancient Sumerian natives of Mesopotamia, due to the high incidence of J-P58 clades with in these peoples (not related to Arabian FGC12). Yet the Turkics are of R1a/N/R1b/Qmake up. How on earth are they related?

[jackrussell]

I make too many assumptions/presumptions based on what is written by you.



There are two choices here:

1-

2- It's baseless and has no evidence of whatever is being mentioned. In this case you support the false narrative, perhaps for a multitude of reasons?


Had any connection been discovered between any modern-day peoples and ancient tribes it would be with peoples from Iraq/Iran/Syria region. Not from the Steppes. For instance, we know that the March Arabs are most likely the candidates of descendants of ancient Sumerian natives of Mesopotamia, due to the high incidence of J-P58 clades with in these peoples (not related to Arabian FGC12). Yet the Turkics are of R1a/N/R1b/Qmake up. How on earth are they related?

Your assumptions and presumptions do not come from what I wrote ; it primarly comes from your self designated and church - state enforced Identity.

Your signature on this board says it all ; doesn't it ?

And you have the audacity to accuse me of having an multitude of reasons .

I am not the one who is dismissing the biological , linguistic , cultural and historical connections in favour of a magic " disappearance act " .

[wvwvw]

We know for sure that Etruscans are not Proto-Carpathian or Danubian or Western Balkan people or we here worshiped Res, our Ancestor Rheas
who was first know Thracian ruler "Greek's added T" Cult of Rheasus or Thracian Horsemen became later the veneration of St. George in Christianity.

Etruscans are Anatolians from Lydia who predate Thracians, little is know about them before.

But Herodotus said that Etruscans came from Lydia.

Herodotus refers to Tyrrhenians ie. the Lydians who colonised Etruria NOT to Etruscans.

There was no such tribe called Etruscans. The original sources all say the region was colonised by Lydian's who called themselves Tyrrhenians and Pelasgians, plus there were native Italian tribes. None of these sources mention an Etruscan colonisation since this is a 19th century revisionist fantasy. All these tribes had an eponymous founder but unsurprisingly the non-existant Etruscans had none.

The eponymous founder of Pelasgians was Pelasgus, the eponymous founder of Tyrrhenians was Tyrsenus, the brother of Lydus who the Lydians were named after.

Several dozen unrelated tribes lived in Etruria and their was NO political union between any of them. All those tribes worshipped their ancestors and eponymous founders. Herodotus says the Tyrrhenians worshiped Meonian Gods because Herodotus give THEIR OWN ACCOUNT about where they came from. The Lydian's obviously agreed with it since they never contradicted it.

The Pelasgians later conquered the Tyrhenians and lived above them and even founded Tyrrhenian Athens. These worshipped Greek Gods. Other tribes worshipped their own Gods. Pliny says the Pelasgains were eventually conquered again by the Lydian Tyrrehenians and this would have been after Herodotus time.