View Poll Results: Would you like to see more, or less, US leadership on the world stage?

Voters
29. You may not vote on this poll
  • I support unapologetic Sintashta-on-chariots like US interventionism worldwide

    0 0%
  • A clear and assertive US leadership as a global hegemon is good for the world and I support it

    2 6.90%
  • I prefer the US leadership as a broker of compromise between nations, taking into consideration their interests

    2 6.90%
  • I would prefer only a limited role of the US and NATO, limited to collective defense rather than interventionism

    8 27.59%
  • I would prefer the rise of multipolar world with different spheres of influences held by major nations and balance of power competition

    9 31.03%
  • I would prefer complete withdrawal of the US into isolationism

    8 27.59%
  • Undecided/Unsure/Need more time to decide

    0 0%
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 30

Thread: Americans and non-Americans: Would you like to see more, or less, US leadership on the world stage?

  1. #1
    Caveat Emptor
    Guest

    1 Not allowed!

    Default Americans and non-Americans: Would you like to see more, or less, US leadership on the world stage?

    Charles Krauthammer and the "Unipolar Moment" proclamation in the aftermath of the end of the Cold War, in 1990 has basically declared the US as a hegemonic power with no parallel in the world that is able to execute a total war on all fronts simultaneously and still win by maximizing all of its resources, even if hypothetically the entire world was against us (an imbalance of power so great that it dwarfs the Roman Empire or the British Empire in comparative real terms).



    Emphasis should be put on the word 'moment'. Critics have since argued that we are now past the unipolar moment and instead live in a multipolar world; other critics actively advocate for the establishment of multipolarity.

    However, with the most recent military budget proposed by the Trump administration and agreed upon by the Democrats, as well as with the agreement of NATO allies to commit between 2-4% of their respective GDPs to defense spending, NATO as a collective can still be considered an unironic global hegemony for decades to come.

    The question is - would you like to see more of an active and assertive US leadership on the world stage, or would you rather see us withdraw from the world stage?

    Do you see the US as an exceptional force for good in the world - a benign hegemon? A Shining City Upon a Hill? Perhaps even the pinnacle of Western civilization, as many do? Or do you hate our guts and would gladly see the rise of multipolar world? Perhaps something in the middle, like a more democratized decision-making on the world stage?

    Any opinion is welcome (especially the critical ones).

  2. #2
    Veteran Member Blondie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Last Online
    Today @ 04:47 PM
    Location
    Budapest
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ethnicity
    Barbarian
    Ancestry
    Uralo-German
    Country
    Germany
    Region
    Donau Schwaben
    Taxonomy
    Subnordid
    Gender
    Posts
    17,890
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 15,161
    Given: 9,797

    3 Not allowed!

    Default

    Please americans get out of Europe

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Last Online
    08-14-2019 @ 07:40 AM
    Location
    Constantinople
    Ethnicity
    European
    Ancestry
    Constantinople and Thessaloniki
    Country
    Turkey
    Region
    Kurdistan
    Y-DNA
    J2
    Taxonomy
    DinaroMed
    Politics
    Monarchy
    Religion
    Orthodox
    Gender
    Posts
    10,961
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 5,720
    Given: 1,142

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Equal.

    Στάλθηκε από το G3311 μου χρησιμοποιώντας Tapatalk

  4. #4
    Caveat Emptor
    Guest

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kis_Kócos View Post
    Please americans get out of Europe
    Thank you for making your point of view explicitly clear

    I am not revealing my personal opinion and beliefs in my threads but rather provide platform for people to express their opinions. Have you heard of the phrase that "Europe is from Venus and America is from Mars"? Here's an article from Politico on this https://www.politico.eu/article/time...re-from-venus/

    It refers to the idea that European lack of militarism and pacifism requires American protection and masculine energy for our collective defense

    Quote Originally Posted by Kaido View Post
    Equal.

    Στάλθηκε από το G3311 μου χρησιμοποιώντας Tapatalk
    So a kind of status quo?
    Last edited by Caveat Emptor; 11-12-2018 at 07:10 PM.

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Last Online
    02-20-2019 @ 09:01 PM
    Ethnicity
    White
    Country
    Mexico
    Politics
    Tribal Communism
    Hero
    Hulk
    Age
    14
    Gender
    Posts
    316
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 63
    Given: 80

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Caveat Emptor View Post
    It refers to the idea that European lack of militarism and pacifism requires American protection and masculine energy for our collective defense
    no, we don't need to be dominated by some savages, who themselves would blow up the entire world to gain immortality, powerful magic and whatever.

    White Americans are a lot less civilized than Europeans, that's for sure.

    Black Americans vs Africans? Not sure about those that can't afford to visit Europe, but black African tourists/immigrants are definitely more civilized than black American tourists/immigrants.

  6. #6
    Veteran Member
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Teutone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Athlete
    Country
    Palestine
    Y-DNA
    I1-Z58
    mtDNA
    J1c1
    Politics
    Would not call myself pro-semitic
    Hero
    Jozef Tiso
    Religion
    Catholic Christian
    Gender
    Posts
    21,950
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 26,875
    Given: 16,891

    2 Not allowed!

    Default

    I would prefer only a limited role of the US and NATO, limited to collective defense rather than interventionism.

    100% signed

  7. #7
    Caveat Emptor
    Guest

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Heterosapiens View Post
    I would prefer only a limited role of the US and NATO, limited to collective defense rather than interventionism.

    100% signed
    Thanks Teutone I was especially curious about your opinion on this matter. I've now concluded that you're far more tolerant of the US leadership than our colleague The Lawspeaker

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Last Online
    02-20-2019 @ 09:01 PM
    Ethnicity
    White
    Country
    Mexico
    Politics
    Tribal Communism
    Hero
    Hulk
    Age
    14
    Gender
    Posts
    316
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 63
    Given: 80

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Heterosapiens View Post
    I would prefer only a limited role of the US and NATO, limited to collective defense rather than interventionism.

    100% signed
    the thing is, what would America get in return? America defends us, OK. But why would America care about Europe defending them, if they can defend themselves?

  9. #9
    Veteran Member Georgia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Last Online
    04-04-2024 @ 10:21 AM
    Ethnicity
    Greek
    Country
    Greece
    Gender
    Posts
    1,549
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,696
    Given: 3,673

    2 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Caveat Emptor View Post
    Thank you for making your point of view explicitly clear

    I am not revealing my personal opinion and beliefs in my threads but rather provide platform for people to express their opinions. Have you heard of the phrase that "Europe is from Venus and America is from Mars"? Here's an article from Politico on this https://www.politico.eu/article/time...re-from-venus/

    It refers to the idea that European lack of militarism and pacifism requires American protection and masculine energy for our collective defense



    So a kind of status quo?
    How Americans protect Europeans?By wreaking havoc on the Arab World and flooding us with refugees?

  10. #10
    Veteran Member
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Teutone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Athlete
    Country
    Palestine
    Y-DNA
    I1-Z58
    mtDNA
    J1c1
    Politics
    Would not call myself pro-semitic
    Hero
    Jozef Tiso
    Religion
    Catholic Christian
    Gender
    Posts
    21,950
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 26,875
    Given: 16,891

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Caveat Emptor View Post
    Thanks Teutone I was especially curious about your opinion on this matter. I've now concluded that you're far more tolerant of the US leadership than our colleague The Lawspeaker
    he just has a emotional breakdown because of this silly ww1 parade. Normally hes alright.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Who is culturally closer to Anglo-Americans - African-Americans or Hispanics?
    By Bobby Martnen in forum Ethno-Cultural Discussion
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 11-24-2018, 07:55 PM
  2. Replies: 29
    Last Post: 02-15-2018, 04:13 PM
  3. More older Americans, less younger Americans employed
    By SwordoftheVistula in forum Economics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-11-2011, 02:27 AM
  4. Americans stock up to be ready for end of the world
    By Sol Invictus in forum Self Defense and Preparedness
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-14-2010, 08:48 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •