Who Owned Serbia? (since 61 BC)

[Yesterday]

[TheMaestro]

Serbia belongs to feared conqueror Pasha Bosniensis, so this is all fake news.

[Bosniensis]

Serbia belongs to feared conqueror Pasha Bosniensis, so this is all fake news.

Emperor Bosniensis, I am not Turk

[Vlatko Vukovic]

Serbia belongs to feared conqueror Pasha Bosniensis, so this is all fake news.

The main problem of Bosniensis is that he doesn't want to admit that modern Serbian identity (and generally South Slavic) is formed not before 7th century, and also with migration. He also does not admit the turkicness of Turkey, calling it Anatolian country etc etc...

[Bosniensis]

The main problem of Bosniensis is that he doesn't want to admit that modern Serbian identity (and generally South Slavic) is formed not before 7th century, and also with migration. He also does not admit the turkicness of Turkey, calling it Anatolian country etc etc...

Hellenas, Greek on this forum said:Western Anatolian Turks are mostly Turkified and Brainswashed Anatolians according to phenotype, genetics, everything.

They have little to do with Turks from central asia except some admixture.

[Papastratosels26]

Nice Video

Στάλθηκε από το G3311 μου χρησιμοποιώντας Tapatalk

[TheMaestro]

Emperor Bosniensis, I am not Turk

And Ottoman?

[Vlatko Vukovic]

Hellenas, Greek on this forum said:Western Anatolian Turks are mostly Turkified and Brainswashed Anatolians according to phenotype, genetics, everything.

They have little to do with Turks from central asia except some admixture.

But you should not look at the details (individual group of people). What about Aegean region? They usually score pretty much East Asian on autosomal DNA calculators? What about Black Sea region? They often show their turkicness on calculator.

Yes, indeed, Anatolia was a long time center of civilisation, but it does not change the fact that Greeks lost it in 15th century, and that a lot of Turks (real Oghuzes) settled there and impose their language, tradition and culture. Altough the Ottoman Empire showed much influence from Byzantine Empire, it also showed some cultural influences from Oghuz Turks (from Central Asia) and this is the fact.

Hellenas, Greek on this forum said:Western Anatolian Turks are mostly Turkified and Brainswashed Anatolians according to phenotype, genetics, everything.

Is important here what somebody said, or what science say?

[Bosniensis]

But you should not look at the details (individual group of people). What about Aegean region? They usually score pretty much East Asian on autosomal DNA calculators? What about Black Sea region? They often show their turkicness on calculator.

Yes, indeed, Anatolia was a long time center of civilisation, but it does not change the fact that Greeks lost it in 15th century, and that a lot of Turks (real Oghuzes) settled there and impose their language, tradition and culture. Altough the Ottoman Empire showed much influence from Byzantine Empire, it also showed some cultural influences from Oghuz Turks (from Central Asia) and this is the fact.



Is important here what somebody said, or what science say?

Show me a gedmatch of a few Turks who score more than 20% East Asian.

South Slavs have ~ 30 Baltic 25 North Atlantic (Celtic) 30 Med

How they compare with Russians? or Poles? they dont.

[Bosniensis]

And Ottoman?

I was never Ottoman.