Stupid dogmas and myths that unite both Left and Right

[Tooting Carmen]

I don't find this comparison exact, since both aren't treaiting the information the same way, thus giving different results.

You may instead explore the significance of the "victim" notion and how minorities could be perceived as "victims", by both the Left and the Right as you presented them.

For the Left, minorities are the victims of a dominant and homogenous majority, but what they truly want is a somewhat balanced multicultural society where there is no more significant majority of any kind, after all, the most spectacular examples of Leftism were the ones of revolutions, fighting always some perceivingly unjust dominance.

On the other hand, the origins of the Right are the ones of aristocratic and self-centred societies, meaning that for them minorities might be the eventual victims of the majority, but that's only because those minorities have been put in an environment (by themselves or others) that's not naturally or rightfully theirs, or because they refuse to stay in their supposed place in society.

What do you think of this ?

An interesting take, but a tad anachronistic.

[hanza]

An interesting take, but a tad anachronistic.

In short :

Left = the White majority is oppressive because she is overwhelming and isn't giving its chance to anything different, which means that the majority should be reduced through various means of either diversification of the majority (cultural means = watching tons of different movies, reading tons of different books, listening tons of different songs = preventing a monocentric society) or importation of minorities.

Right = the White majority is only oppressive because there are minorities and tendencies in the society deemed rightfully undesirable suffering from their lack of legitimity before all, so they should either join the majority (acculturation) either leave the countries and places possessed as civic, natural, religious rights.