United States
0
I don't know where you're getting all of this information but it's not accurate. Reading "studies" doesn't make something true and lots of studies contradict each other. There's a lot to unpack here.Originally Posted by manor
The issue of having aboriginal ("Indian"/native/first nations, whatever) blood is dead wrong and I know that due to recent controversy over the American libtard senator, Elizabeth Warren, claiming to be part Cherokee. What I read, and much of this came from tribal groups, themselves, is that while lots of Americans claim to have Indian blood, they do not and that was backed up by alleged DNA "studies" (which could also be wrong but I tend to doubt it). Sure there are some of other ancestries mixed with "natives" but it's not common and, I suppose, that's mostly due to the fact that most Indians live on reservations. The Pueblo Indians in New Mexico don't even socially mix with outsiders in the same towns. I'm from Michigan and don't know one single Indian, though they are here and have reservations and own the casinos. I've known a couple of people who claim to have "been told" they have some ancestor who was an Indian and that's about it. There are regions in the US where it's more likely to find other races mixed with Indians and Oklahoma is one because that where the Cherokee were driven to in the "trail of tears" when they were forced out of the south but it is not the norm across the nation.
The same is true for mixes of European decent and African. New Orleans is full of it with the Creoles. It seems the French and Spanish were much more liberal about race mixing than the English and northern Europeans were. I will grant you there are more and more whites mixed with blacks, nowadays, mainly due to deliberate social engineering and the developing of the welfare state. In those cases, it's usually fat, ugly white chicks (mud sharks) dating black guys. The same is true for white American females who hook up with with Muslims - they tend to be the social losers who don't fit in.
This is a huge country and the various parts of it are very different. It's much more common to find someone of white Euro heritage married to an Hispanic, in a place like California, than in Indiana or Ohio and that's just logical because of the geography and history. And, a lot of those intermarriages are white Euro married to Spanish blood Mexicans, not so much mestizos (Spanish+AmerIndian). The upper class Mexicans are generally Spanish, not mestizo. Still - and I lived in California for some years - Mexicans (mestizos) usually date and marry other Mexicans or Mexican Americans. Same for the east Asian Americans. The Japanes stick together, the Chinese stick together, the Koreans hate everybody, etc. This is the natural order, my friend, as in the animal kingdom. I've yet to see a cardinal nesting with a woodpecker. "Birds of feather" is true and all of this forced multicultural shit is a social engineering agenda and not natural.
I have a theory that most natural race and culture mixing occurred along the ancient trade routes and, of course, big cities where immigrants congregate when they land in a new country. The UN social engineers are even messing with that by placing people like Somalis in small, all white towns across America. It causes nothing but problems, which is the intention. If people choose to mix it up in a cosmopolitan environment like, say, Singapore, Istanbul, Los Angeles, etc, that's one thing and based upon freedom of choice and those who find that kind of life more stimulating. In provincial areas and small towns it is not the case.
As for the richer and more successful intermarrying, I'm not buying it. Yeah, maybe some eccentric super rich creative types or moguls (actors, media types, etc) but not most well off and successful. Where I live was mostly settled by the Dutch and they don't hardly marry a Catholic let alone a black person. They tend to own lots of land (because they farm or their ancestors did), have a strong work and moral ethic, good business sense and save money. The Dutch community around here is VERY wealthy but they don't flaunt it. They all go to the same churches and send their kids to Christian schools. It's the homogeneous cultures that are most wealthy and successful. Everybody is "on the same page", so to speak, with the same values, ethics and understanding of what life is it they're building. There's probably no better example of an insular group of people who are the richest and most successful than the Jews. While they are "cosmopolitans", most stick to the tribe, wherever they are. They may advocate race and culture mixing for everyone else (an agenda) but not for themselves and not for Israel!
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks