0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,716 Given: 1,188 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,716 Given: 1,188 |
Everything has to do with anything in genetics.
http://eurogenes.blogspot.com/2016/0...stern.html?m=1
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,328 Given: 2,699 |
This is old story. Only one clearly outlier Anatolian farmer with J2a shows significant level (one digits) of CHG, and it is not even proper CHG but more than likely something related to Tepecik-Ciftlik. CHG became widespread among Anatolians during the Middle Bronze Age. Before that, only at trace amounts at best.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,716 Given: 1,188 |
http://eurogenes.blogspot.com/2016/0...67877194660552
It's probably not direct ancestry but something is there that differentiates them. That's why I said it's interesting that the chg seems to be ansorbed by an in that run.
This makes sense. You see a lot of variation among Italians.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,979 Given: 1,060 |
PCA plot :
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,328 Given: 2,699 |
Northeastern Italy clearly shifting towards Eastern Europe, Piedmont towards Northwestern Europe. Both of these clusters (NItaly6 and NItaly1) got 0% Anatolian admixuture, which might have been diluted by contacts with Central European pops similar to what occured with South Slavs. Probably contacts with Slovenians and French respectively.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,328 Given: 2,699 |
The pie charts shows Veneto as a perfect intermediate between Emilia-Romagna and Friuli.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks