Do Women Secretly WANT Patriarchy?

[Ayetooey]

You're Montenegrin Mortimer, you got savage tribal blood running through your veins, just fucking take a woman in exchange for 5 goats.

[Dorian]

You're Montenegrin Mortimer, you got savage tribal blood running through your veins, just fucking take a woman in exchange for 5 goats.

hahahahaha good one

[Prinses]

I'm a weakling I don't fix things I cannot beat up someone or carry heavy bags and even mentally I'm weak because I'm often insecure and don't stand on my own I would be a bad husband somehow maybe better that I am not responsible for a wife too only for myself

I can say you have a better heart than most of the fucks on the internet. I trurly hope you will find someone in your life who sees that and appreciates you for who you are.

[The Lawspeaker]

Good on the flag change, Prinses, but Overijssel is a Dutch province, not a Turkish one.

[Marmara]

I don't think that women want patriarchy. Women want to be taken seriously and as an equal part of society, I am pretty sure about this.
It doesn't mean that they want a men's transformation into weak creatures.
There still has to be that men's "aura", that strong attitude but not cruelty.

Which means Assertive.

Long time no see Magnolia.

[Nebuchadnezzar]

They want patriarchy from Muslims, not from White men.

Damn girl....
you don't have to tell a nigga twice

[cosmoo]

The unmanifest laws to which magnetism of eros is subject do not necessarily seek the absolute masculinity in a woman's case, or the absolute femininity in that of a man. The cause for that lies in the fact that sex is a metaphysical category before it is physical, and that the vast majority of people are not sexually split evenly in the suprasensible, pre-conditioned sphere, no matter what their, to use a biological term, "primary sexual characteristic" is. Therefore, the laws of attraction (not talking about the cases of involuted forms, like lust) seek to connect the individuals which fit each other complementarily in order to symbolize a state of overcoming human dualism and attainment of primordial unity.

The absolute masculine principle is the one of transcendence, sufficiency, passive activity (in sense of unmoved mover), permanence and unchangeability, impassability. His is the matterless Form, and his symbols are Sun, light, and heavens.
Its absolute feminine counterpart is the one of earthliness, need, active passivity (in sense of identifying with action - therefore not truly acting, but unwittingly being acted upon), change, and temporarity. Her is the formless Matter, symbolized by telluric darkness and waters.

In eros proper, woman (non-being/Becoming) affixes herself to a man (Being) for she finds a limit to her restlessness in his stability. Only through selfless attachment to another can she partake in transcendence.
A man is self-sufficient, yet he, along with others means of ascent, can benefit from sexual magnetism through its unifying and dis-individualizing properties (this can lead to ascent, but also, and perhaps more commonly, to a fall to sub-individual state - hence why for him it is akin to a double-edged sword). To refer to Hindu tradition relayed in one of Upanishads, when a man loves (this does not mean attachment) a woman, in a true way, he loves her not for herself, but for the love of atman (Self).

This, in short, is how pure attraction works (even though in most it acts unconsciously and sends them into a confused state of feelings), and more importantly, its causes.
As for the meaning of "masculinity" in purely mechanical and most superficial sense as is commonly understood in this confused and dark age, I cannot help but notice how, in actuality, it in many aspects is a manifesfation of naught but of feminine principles.

[Nebuchadnezzar]

1) I went to university, both in Sweden and in the UK.

2) I worked as a chef, to provide for my man, and then I went to law school in the UK. My mom is an executive and in the top 1% income earners in Sweden. So she can easily afford to pay for my family.

3) However my mom only had one kid, because when you work 60 hours a week and go on business trips several times a month, it takes a toll on your relationships.

Bich that has to be either the dumbest or saddest story I've ever heard.....

1. Your degree in Gender studies isn't worth the cost of the paper you handed in, when you wrote the bachelor's degree and handed to your university, in Swedistan.

2. You being a chef(Which is the worst kind of job any sane self-degnified human can get), only further demonstrates what's being discussed in the first point, and given the bad choices in life you made, if I was your mom, i wouldn't support your 35 year old shitposting ass either, because you'll probably take any good advice and flush it down the toilet.

3.So your mom is a hardworking woman, are you trying to tell the rest of us, that you're somehow smarter than her because you're a baby-factory ?

[nittionia]

Strong men are different from douchebags.

[Dorian]

The unmanifest laws to which magnetism of eros is subject do not necessarily seek the absolute masculinity in a woman's case, or the absolute femininity in that of a man. The cause for that lies in the fact that sex is a metaphysical category before it is physical, and that the vast majority of people are not sexually split evenly in the suprasensible, pre-conditioned sphere, no matter what their, to use a biological term, "primary sexual characteristic" is. Therefore, the laws of attraction (not talking about the cases of involuted forms, like lust) seek to connect the individuals which fit each other complementarily in order to symbolize a state of overcoming human dualism and attainment of primordial unity.

Great stuff, Is this inspired by Carl Jung?