1
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,396 Given: 6,059 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 11,113 Given: 10,158 |
I wouldn't trust ancestrydna fully, it isn't the most accurate, it gave me majority central europe instead of splitting up my components for example, i only got 7% British. Also the east european you got has croat reference populations so it'd be bundled in. Illyrian/native dna is evident because you plot to the south of Slavs like Ukraine, Poland etc, where proto-Croats came from.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,573 Given: 3,466 |
They ain't close at all,gedmatch is pure aspie shit because only their ancient components are relatively % closer but this does not mean anything, only ibd sharing matters and all yugoslavs share ibd with each other more than to any nation.Croats share no ibd with hungarians, its not hard to put 2 and 2 together and see that hungarians did not mix with croats and vice versa.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,396 Given: 6,059 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,396 Given: 6,059 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,396 Given: 6,059 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,636 Given: 40 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,469 Given: 941 |
Less Balkan influenced than Serbs are, and also more Central Euro influence from mixing with Hungarians (who are half Slavic half Germanic population) and Germans.
Some Croat regions are more Balkan influenced (like Dalmatia and Western Herzegovina), and people from there can be closser to Bosnian (Serb, Croat, Muslim) average or even to Serbs.
Using 2 populations approximation:
1 50% Croatian +50% Serbian @ 2.265001
Originally Posted by The Destroyer
Thumbs Up |
Received: 12,781 Given: 8,063 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks