0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,283 Given: 769 |
DNA and phenotype don't perfectly correlate.
The native ancient populations of Northern Italy, Switzerland and Austria were very close (Celtics). Until the Swiss-Germans were Germanized, the Northern Italians latinized, etc.
I can trace my Swiss-German family as far back as 1200, and there are registries that show how their surnames became Germanized when the Burgundians came ("In Campo" became "Imfeld", etc.).
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,378 Given: 1,377 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,495 Given: 884 |
And somehow this is the biggest problem here on TA when doing Genetics x Phenotype. Seems there're more things to explore on this than taking simple conclusions now about this issue because we advanced something at genetics. IMO it's impossible to correlate genetic racial heritage to phenotype right now, maybe in some years.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 25,690 Given: 23,946 |
No, they are not.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 25,690 Given: 23,946 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,957 Given: 57,209 |
Wrong. DNA and phenotypes are very related. It have nothing to do with that.
The real answer is that Iberians are somewhat closer only to some Northern Europeans(Brits, French, etc...) due to relatively higher WHG admixture.
This why some Nortwestern Europeans can be very similar to Iberians in phenotype but in other parts of Northern Europe it don't happens.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,396 Given: 6,059 |
north italy has colder climate than iberia, with little sun
Thumbs Up |
Received: 25,690 Given: 23,946 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,378 Given: 1,377 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks