0
Yes I know I have discussed this before, but I'd like to bring it up again. Not so much regarding women but especially regarding men, the difference in the general beauty ideals found in both countries is actually quite striking. If you look at US male actors, TV models and presenters and compare them to their British counterparts, the percentage of them with blond hair, blue eyes and Germanic features is noticeably higher. But how and why is this? Wouldn't the high numbers of White Americans with Italian, Greek and/or Jewish ancestry in particular make them, if anything, darker and more Med-influenced as a whole than the British?
But anyway, if you look at the actors generally considered to be the most attractive and successful in Britain, they tend to be largely dark-haired, slim and gentlemanly - what we in anthrofora call "Atlantids" usually. Such examples include Roger Moore, Sean Connery, Colin Firth, Hugh Grant, Rupert Everett, Henry Cavill and Christian Bale. When Daniel Craig was first cast as James Bond, many people attacked him for his blond hair, ice-blue eyes and pseudo-Slavic features being the precise opposite of how Bond is "supposed" to look. What's more, actors like Charlie Hunnam have had more success in the US than the UK, in large part because they conform more to a "Hollywood ideal" of male beauty than a British one.
In contrast to most of the aforementioned British actors, what used to be called the "all-American" male ideal is quite different - in this case, the trend is for blond hair, blue eyes, square jaws and muscular physiques. Such examples include Brad Pitt, Paul Walker, Robert Redford, Sean William Scott, Owen Wilson, Bradley Cooper, Greg Germann, Judge Reinhold and Woody Harrelson.
So what explains this disparity? Were the British settlers who went to the US disproportionately blond and Germanic? Was the impact of immigration from Germany, Netherlands and Scandinavia in the US really that big? Or is it mostly due to there being just a different beauty ideal, routed at least in part in the US being a rather more 'race-conscious' nation than Britain from its inception?
Bookmarks