0
This my dear interlocutor is charismatic authority, and it not less violent than others in any case, it just happened to be the least efficient and rational in the tripartite classification of authority according to Weber's works. If not being the most violent of them, because it lines on the singularity of the leader and his non-replaceability, it also ends quite tragically in what we call the redundance of charisma.
As most of my exchanges I want to end this with a concord, and say that words can be as violent as acts, and violence is a natural character of men, neither good or bad, it can be ruled over as long as the person his aggressive temperament.
Bookmarks