Which Are The Main Human Racial Divisions In Your Opinion?

[Maguzanci]

This is how I divide the world. I know it's not scientific. ;p

1. Caucasoid -
European (which can be further divided) - West Asian (same) - Levant - Peninsular Arab - North African East (Egyptians are their own thing IMO) - North African West

North African East Bleeds into
2. Negroid - aka SSA
Capoid - Bantu - Pygmy - East Africans like Massai and Dinka

3. Mongoloid A - This is my favorite race to study because they have the greatest diversity in terms of civilization and have conquered every conceivable typography
Mongolians and Central Asians - East Asian (Han) and related groups - S. East Asians - Inuit and related people

4. Mongoloid B -Non Inuit/Eskimo Native Americans - They've been separate from their Asian cousins long enough so that they've become their own race, but there is plenty of overlap and they've kept some physical characteristics, like their hair. I find this group a lot less interesting.

5. Australoid/Non-African Negroids - Groups of S. Asia and the Oceania that range from Andaman Islanders to Australian Aboriginals. They can extend into parts of the Peninsular Middle East, once settled as far north as Greece, and probably were the first people to land in the Americas. I don't think of them as a single race, but rather a collection of people who resemble each other and came from an original OOA exodus - but time, other admixture, and isolation has probably created a very fractured racial group genetically.

Mixed Racial Groups:

South Asians: A blend of three major Racial Groups to various degrees, they're basically their own race.
Polynesians: A mix of two or three major groups, usually Australoid and Mongoloid, although recent European influx has added it to the mix. Some Eastern Islanders look white, IMO, as well as Hawaiians.
Horn Africans and South Maghreb: Mix of Negroid and Caucasoid

Special Mention: "Hispanics" - Latin Americans will turn into their own race composed of Negroid/Mongoloid B/Caucasoids of Mostly S. European decent with a gradient, like South Asians within the next several hundred years.

I would put Native Americans in the Mixed Racial Groups like South Asians, Horn Africans, Polynesians rather than as Mongoloid B imo. Amerinds are a mix of ancient Mongoloid (more towards the Asiatic side of course) and Caucasoid (from their ANE ancestry which is a predominantly Caucasoid component related to Paleolithic Europeans with ASI-like (a indigenous component of South Asians related to Australoids/Negritoids) admix) rather than actually being solely Mongoloid.

[Maguzanci]

I think the form exact: Mongoloid, Caucasoid, Negroid and Australoid It remains hegemonic...

Because I, for example, can say I'm 70% caucasoid, 30% mongoloid. Anything else that someone sees (castizo, harnizo, mestizo, euroasian, pseudo-turkish) is the same: 70% caucasoid, 30% mongoloid, only more "detailed".

Wel Amerinds haf sum Paleolithic European-related Caucasoid ancestry fam dere ANE admixture so you wud probli bii slitli les mongoloid den det.

[Maguzanci]

In the Old World, which population scores 70% European and 30% Mongoloid? Central Asians?

Ya sum Central Asiens lyk Turkmen, som Uzbek, som Tajiks (aldo dere Caucasoid komponen is more lyk indigenous Iranian-like).

[Phenix]

You can categorize humanity in a interminable number of boxes, only thing needed is a criterion(s).

MENA isn't really a racial category imo, it's more of a cultural and linguistic category.

Neither, it's a just geopolitical term with fluctuant boundaries.

[El_Abominacion]

Whites
Blacks
Asians (Mongoloids)
Indians
Australoids
Native Americans (Amerindians)
Mestizos (Idk If this count)

Imo

I wouldn't say Mestizos are a racial division as they're comprised of 2/3 races. With everything else though I agree

[Septentrion]

Perhaps, something like this?

Europeans
Amerindians
Middle Easterners
Northern Africans
West Asians
Central Asians
South Asians
Australian Aboriginals
South East Asians
East Asians
Black Africans
Pacific Islanders

What do you think? Discuss...

Oh well!!! The truth is that there is actually at the moment on earth, one human race at the moment living on the earth. This race is called the Homo Sapien Sapiens, it oldest remains ever found are on the African continent. Yes, Homo Sapien Sapiens have adapted to different environments throughout the planet giving rise to various phenotypes not races! Although you could call them sub-racial phenotypes.
1.) Africanoid (predominates in Africa as the name suggest)
2.) Orientaloid (predominates West Asia and parts of Northern Africa)
3.) Sub-continental Indianoid (predominates in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri-Lanka)
4.) Asian Pygmoid (predominates parts of Southern Asia)
5.) Australoid (predominates the South Pacific region)
6.) Sinoid (predominates East Asia)
7.) Pacificoid (predominates in the Pacific region)
8.) Mongoloid (predominates North-East Asia including parts of Russia)
9.) Europoid (predominant in Europe)
10.) Amerindianoid (predominates the Americas)
11.) Arctic (predominate in the Artic region)

[Septentrion]

Caucasoids
Negroids
Mongoloids
Australoids

These are the important ones. But even they aren't particularly important.

Why are you calling those important? So other people are not important! Caucasoid is a joke and doesn't exist! Rather have Europoid for Europeans!

[Creoda]

Oh well!!! The truth is that there is actually at the moment on earth, one human race at the moment living on the earth. This race is called the Homo Sapien Sapiens, it oldest remains ever found are on the African continent. Yes, Homo Sapien Sapiens have adapted to different environments throughout the planet giving rise to various phenotypes not races! Although you could call them sub-racial phenotypes.

Why are you trying to redefine the meaning of race like a leftist? If anything, Caucasoid, Negroid, Mongoloid etc are far too broad to be considered meaningful races in the original true sense of the word. Try sub-species.

race (n.2)

"people of common descent," a word from the 16th century, from Middle French race, earlier razza "race, breed, lineage, family" (16c.), possibly from Italian razza, of unknown origin (cognate with Spanish and Portuguese raza). Etymologists say no connection with Latin radix "root," though they admit this might have influenced the "tribe, nation" sense.

Original senses in English included "wines with characteristic flavor" (1520), "group of people with common occupation" (c. 1500), and "generation" (1540s). Meaning "tribe, nation, or people regarded as of common stock" is by 1560s. Modern meaning of "one of the great divisions of mankind based on physical peculiarities" is from 1774 (though as OED points out, even among anthropologists there never has been an accepted classification of these).