0
I think Islam cannot be reformed. It is too strict. The Qur'an is not as long as the Bible (it is shorter than the New Testament). That is why the Qur'an's exhortations to violence stand out. The Qur'an is a more stream-line book. Inciting hatred towards non-believers is central to the faith. The Qur'an talks about the non-believers more than the believers. No matter which page you open your Qur'an, you will find denunciations of the non-believers. Islam teaches Muslims to hate those "who hate Allah"; of course in practice this ends up causing Muslims to hate non-Muslims.
Abrogation (naskh)
The Meccan verses are more tolerant. In Islamic theology, the Medinan *violent* passages take precedence over the Meccan *peaceful* passages. This is called "Naskh", Abrogation. One would have to switch these two, so that the Meccan verses take precedence. Some reformers who have tried this have been executed (example Muhammad Taha in Sudan).
Bookmarks