0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,396 Given: 6,059 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 20,924 Given: 18,997 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,396 Given: 6,059 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,396 Given: 6,059 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,473 Given: 10,006 |
Sure Peterski. The Brits have obviously undergone some drift, making them their own category. But most of them in your thread tend to be more Dutch/Danish than French/Bavarian/Austrian
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,473 Given: 10,006 |
mmmmmViking without foreigners.png
Interesting stuff, here user Aren took out the foreigners.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 711 Given: 1,731 |
What do you understand by "Germanics"?
British Bell Beakers were not for sure protoGermanic people.
It seems they were protoCeltic people,in fact.
So, actually, it would be more correct to say that some Germanic speakers are having strong ancestry from British Celts and not only from British Celts, from Hallstatt Celts also, if we take South Germany and Austria.
Celts existed before Germanics, as ethnicities so British Celts could not be separated Germanics.
First time when a Germanic language reached Britain is with AngloSaxons.
Celts were in Britain, very clearly, before AngloSaxons came there.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,473 Given: 10,006 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,473 Given: 10,006 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks