Page 2 of 11 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 107

Thread: Who was the best ruler in the history of your country ?

  1. #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Last Online
    01-17-2020 @ 06:22 PM
    Ethnicity
    Melania's boy toy
    Country
    United States
    Region
    Zagreb
    Gender
    Posts
    8,383
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 5,396
    Given: 6,059

    2 Not allowed!

    Default

    From ethnic Croatian rulers it would be Petar Krešimir IV, and Tomislav, both of House Trpimirović. From later non Croat Kings common pesantry was most attached to Matthias Corvinus.
    Hence Matija is so common name in North Croatia and even Slovenia today.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_..._IV_of_Croatia
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tomislav_of_Croatia
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthias_Corvinus

  2. #12
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Last Online
    05-16-2023 @ 02:30 PM
    Ethnicity
    Blank
    Country
    United States
    Religion
    Christian
    Relationship Status
    Married parent
    Gender
    Posts
    5,664
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 6,284
    Given: 4,691

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Calvin Coolidge, IMO.

  3. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Diyar-ı Rum
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Ar-Rum, Ottoman, Byzantine
    Ethnicity
    Bosniak
    Ancestry
    25% N.Macedonian, 25% Albanian + 50% Dalmatia Slavic mixed Vlach
    Country
    Bosnia
    Region
    Dalmatia
    Y-DNA
    I2
    mtDNA
    H28
    Taxonomy
    Dinarid + Pontid
    Politics
    Neo-Ottomanism
    Hero
    Tzepeles Komnenos, Mehmed II
    Religion
    Ottoman Islam
    Gender
    Posts
    17,720
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 8,216
    Given: 5,754

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    There were so many of them of Great Importance in different eras it's hard to name ONE that stand out.

  4. #14
    Ülev
    Guest

    1 Not allowed!

  5. #15
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Last Online
    01-17-2020 @ 06:22 PM
    Ethnicity
    Melania's boy toy
    Country
    United States
    Region
    Zagreb
    Gender
    Posts
    8,383
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 5,396
    Given: 6,059

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    From early tribal Croatian rulers Domagoj was most badass: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domagoj_of_Croatia

    Legendary Pirate and Warrior.

    -After Domagoj's death, Venetian's chronicles named him "The worst duke of Slavs" (Latin: Sclavorum pessimo duce).

    Another early leaders worthy of mention were Borna and Ljudevit.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borna_(duke)
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ljudevit

  6. #16
    I was blind but now I see
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Sebastianus Rex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Last Online
    04-10-2024 @ 03:48 AM
    Ethnicity
    Portuguese
    Country
    Portugal
    Gender
    Posts
    10,330
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 8,665
    Given: 5,623

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ouroboros View Post
    D. Pedro II

    In the 19th century Brazil had much better status in the world in large part due to the fact of being governed by an important European dynastic house (Bragança and Habsburg, that's why our national flag is yellow and green) as other Latin American nations were merely banana republics governed by incompetent farmers. D. Pedro was a great man capable of speaking more than 20 languages (including Sanskrit, Hebrew and Ancient Persian) and was probably the greatest figure to ever step foot in the American continent.

    The biggest mistake in Brazilian history was the end of monarchy.

    20 languages !! That's truly impressive, I knew that he was a man of culture who had been very well prepared, but wasn't aware he was so to such degree.

    It was a pity indeed that the masonic-republicanist fever destroyed the only Monarchy on the American continent.

    Getúlio Vargas

    Unified the country by force and made Brazil an industrialized state, created a semi-fascist constitution which had guarantee of workers rights and was a very competent ruler.

    He isn't the best for two reasons: destroyed regional autonomy for the states (including suppressing languages other than Portuguese) and abandoned the eugenics program. If the eugenics program of previous governments was maintained Brazil would be a fully White nation today.

    Wasn't the policy of the "branqueamento do Brasil" focused more on incentivating european immigration than actual eugenics measures ?

  7. #17
    El_Abominacion
    Guest

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Winston Churchill

  8. #18
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Last Online
    01-17-2020 @ 06:22 PM
    Ethnicity
    Melania's boy toy
    Country
    United States
    Region
    Zagreb
    Gender
    Posts
    8,383
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 5,396
    Given: 6,059

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    From newer Era: Franjo Tuđman, without whom modern Croatia would remain just a dream.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franjo_Tu%C4%91man

    And lastly, being Purger I must mention Bela IV, who was basically founder of my city when he declared Zagreb free Royal town. For this alone he deserve place on my list.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B%C3%A9la_IV_of_Hungary

  9. #19
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Last Online
    11-07-2022 @ 08:46 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Vlach, Romance
    Ethnicity
    Romanian
    Country
    United States
    Religion
    Orthodox Christian
    Relationship Status
    Married
    Gender
    Posts
    7,379
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 3,983
    Given: 2,435

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    in approximate chronological order:

    Basarab I, first independent ruler of Wallachia
    Dragos, first ruler of Moldavia
    Bogdan I, first independent ruler of Moldavia
    Mircea the Elder, established the policy of insubordination vs the Ottoman Empire of the Romanian principalities
    Stephen the Great, great military strategist and patron of arts in Moldavia
    Vlad the Impaler, able military commander and ruler of Wallachia
    Michael the Brave, first Romanian ruler over all 3 major Romanian principalities: Wallachia, Moldavia and Transylvania
    Constantin Brâncoveanu, patron of arts in Wallachia, martyred by the Ottomans in 1714
    Dimitrie Cantemir, scientist and encyclopedist, ruler of Moldavia
    Alexandru Ioan Cuza, reformist and first ruler of Romania
    Carol I, first king of Romania (that included Wallachia and Moldova)
    Ferdinand I, first king of the Greater Romania (that included Wallachia, Moldavia and Transylvania)

  10. #20
    Veteran Member Argentano's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Last Online
    06-08-2022 @ 02:43 PM
    Location
    Argentina
    Ethnicity
    Gaucho
    Country
    Argentina
    Y-DNA
    R1B1B2A1A
    mtDNA
    H
    Gender
    Posts
    11,923
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 12,362
    Given: 11,959

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    I guess Sarmiento

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doming...tino_Sarmiento

    President of Argentina, 1868–1874

    President Sarmiento in 1873.
    Domingo Faustino Sarmiento served as President of the Republic of Argentina from 1868 to 1874, becoming president despite the maneuverings of his predecessor Bartolomé Mitre.[43] According to biographer Allison Bunkley, his presidency "marks the advent of the middle, or land-owning classes as the pivot power of the nation. The age of the gaucho had ended, and the age of the merchant and cattleman had begun."[44] Sarmiento sought to create basic freedoms, and wanted to ensure civil safety and progress for everyone, not just the few. Sarmiento's tour of the United States had given him many new ideas about politics, democracy, and the structure of society, especially when he was the Argentine ambassador to the country from 1865 to 1868. He found New England, specifically the Boston-Cambridge area to be the source of much of his influence, writing in an Argentine newspaper that New England was "the cradle of the modern republic, the school for all of America." He described Boston as "The pioneer city of the modern world, the Zion of the ancient Puritans ... Europe contemplates in New England the power which in the future will supplant her."[45] Not only did Sarmiento evolve political ideas, but also structural ones by transitioning Argentina from a primarily agricultural economy to one focused on cities and industry.[46]

    Historian David Rock notes that, beyond putting an end to caudillismo, Sarmiento's main achievements in government concerned his promotion of education. As Rock reports, "between 1868 and 1874 educational subsidies from the central government to the provinces quadrupled."[43] He established 800 educational and military institutions, and his improvements to the educational system enabled 100,000 children to attend school.

    He also pushed forward modernization more generally, building infrastructure including 5,000 kilometres (3,100 mi) of telegraph line across the country for improved communications, making it easier for the government in Buenos Aires and the provinces to communicate; modernizing the postal and train systems which he believed to be integral for interregional and national economies, as well as building the Red Line, a train line that would bring goods to Buenos Aires in order to better facilitate trade with Great Britain. By the end of his presidency, the Red Line extended 1,331 kilometres (827 mi). In 1869, he conducted Argentina's first national census.[27]

    Though Sarmiento is well known historically, he was not a popular president.[47] Indeed, Rock judges that "by and large his administration was a disappointment".[43] During his presidency, Argentina conducted an unpopular war against Paraguay; at the same time, people were displeased with him for not fighting for the Straits of Magellan from Chile.[47] Although he increased productivity, he increased expenditures, which also negatively affected his popularity.[48] In addition, the arrival of a large influx of European immigrants was blamed for the outbreak of Yellow Fever in Buenos Aires and the risk of civil war.[48] Moreover, Sarmiento's presidency was further marked by ongoing rivalry between Buenos Aires and the provinces. In the war against Paraguay, Sarmiento's adopted son was killed.[27] Sarmiento suffered from immense grief and was thought to never have been the same again.

    On August 22, 1873, Sarmiento was the target of an unsuccessful assassination attempt, when two Italian anarchist brothers shot at his coach. They had been hired by federal caudillo Ricardo López Jordán.[27] A year later in 1874, he completed his term as President and stepped down, handing his presidency over to Nicolás Avellaneda, his former Minister of Education.[49]
    Philosophy

    Sarmiento was well known for his modernization of the country, and for his improvements to the educational system. He firmly believed in democracy and European liberalism, but was most often seen as a romantic. Sarmiento was well versed in Western philosophy including the works of Karl Marx and John Stuart Mill.[53] He was particularly fascinated with the liberty given to those living in the United States, which he witnessed as a representative of the Peruvian government. He did, however, see pitfalls to liberty, pointing for example to the aftermath of the French Revolution, which he compared to Argentina's own May Revolution.[54] He believed that liberty could turn into anarchy and thus civil war, which is what happened in France and in Argentina. Therefore, his use of the term "liberty" was more in reference to a laissez-faire approach to the economy, and religious liberty.[54] Though a Catholic himself, he began to adopt the ideas of separation of church and state modeled after the US.[55] He believed that there should be more religious freedom, and less religious affiliation in schools.[56] This was one of many ways in which Sarmiento tried to connect South America to North America.[57]

    Sarmiento believed that the material and social needs of people had to be satisfied but not at the cost of order and decorum. He put great importance on law and citizen participation. These ideas he most equated to Rome and to the United States, a society which he viewed as exhibiting similar qualities. In order to civilize the Argentine society and make it equal to that of Rome or the United States, Sarmiento believed in eliminating the caudillos, or the larger landholdings and establishing multiple agricultural colonies run by European immigrants.[58]

    Coming from a family of writers, orators, and clerics, Domingo Sarmiento placed a great value on education and learning. He opened a number of schools including the first school in Latin America for teachers in Santiago in 1842: La Escuela Normal Preceptores de Chile.[42] He proceeded to open 18 more schools and had mostly female teachers from the USA come to Argentina to instruct graduates how to be effective when teaching.[42] Sarmiento's belief was that education was the key to happiness and success, and that a nation could not be democratic if it was not educated.[59] "We must educate our rulers," he said. "An ignorant people will always choose Rosas."[60]

Page 2 of 11 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-13-2019, 11:40 PM
  2. Replies: 33
    Last Post: 11-12-2018, 10:34 AM
  3. Which Country has the Richest History?
    By Yaroslav in forum History
    Replies: 101
    Last Post: 01-26-2013, 01:31 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •