0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 11,113 Given: 10,158 |
It isn't proto germanic; it's paleo european. R1b-U106 is proto germanic. I1 was all over Europe at one point;
Serbs from Sandzak are 25% I1; they have similar origin to Serbs from Dalmatia, there was even a news article on it.
https://www.telegraf.rs/vesti/174537...-pravo-poreklo
The results don't mean Dalmatian Serbs are 24% Germanic; it has a founder effect from a few men who founded these clans, within 6 generations any Germanic dna would be nonresistant due to breeding with different clans, and we're talking many hundreds of years here. I believe Drobjnak I1 came from Normans, Macur the saxons (might of been other way round). People who are part of these clans know it based off their family history, so I don't find these results that shocking (paternal lines are well documented by Serbs, due to existence of clans. slavas, etc.)
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,636 Given: 40 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 11,113 Given: 10,158 |
This isn't conclusive anyway, only for fun based off tested people; but I knew I1 would be elevated due to the migrations to Dalmatia from those clans. Pribislav posted map before which showed I1 peaks in sandzak serbs and dalmatian serbs, and sandzak serbs are 25%.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 15,300 Given: 9,873 |
LOL nope, I1 is proto-germanic, this marker is highest in south Sweden, south Norway and Denmark (it was a home of proto-germanic peoples) and the germanic languages belong to paleo-european family:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleo-European_languages
By your logic I2 is not slavic but paleo-european...
Thumbs Up |
Received: 11,113 Given: 10,158 |
I2 is paleo european, as is I1. I2 was slavicised by R1A, and I1 were Germanised by R1b-u106; Germanics/Slavic languages are indo european languages, I1/I2 are paleo European Y dna and existed in Europe long before indo europeans.
This debate is pointless anyway; based off migration and clan history I could of told you I1 would be high in dalmatian serbs before I even checked.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,636 Given: 40 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 15,300 Given: 9,873 |
That's not true.
1. The I1 or I2 marker is paleo-european, but the subgroups of I1 and I2 is not. Subroups of I1 is belong to proto-germanic population, just like branches of I2 belong to proto-slavic ethnicity.
2. Proto Iindo-Europeans were europeans too, the PIE homeland was in Pontic Steppe and West Asia:
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,396 Given: 6,059 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,396 Given: 6,059 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks