0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,636 Given: 40 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,636 Given: 40 |
CTS10228 is clearly Slavic.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,208 Given: 1,745 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,636 Given: 40 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,208 Given: 1,745 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,636 Given: 40 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,396 Given: 6,059 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 94 Given: 75 |
We didn't steel Hasanaginica. How can I steel something which is written in my dialect? It's a bullshit you wrote there.
And Morlachs were just a geographic term to describe the people who lived behind the dalmatian mountains used bz Venetians, so it had nothing to do with their real origin. They were all Slavs in fact.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,636 Given: 40 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,636 Given: 40 |
If "Morlachs" were some Latin speaking Vlachs, how their language disappeared over night and there is no any trace of that language?
My origin is from most continental part of Dalmatia where Venetian ruled 110 years. As I already said my ancestors used many borrowed Italian words, modified of course. Relatively short Venetian rule plus area is 50 km from Zadar where lived the closest Italian speakers (foreigners of different religion in the eyes of my ancestors), but still there was Italian linguistic influence on people from my region.
I wonder how is possible that not a single East Romance word did not survive anywhere in Dalmatia if a lot of East Romance speakers lived there?
Other thing.
Where is genetic in Dalmatia which indicated of presence of East Romance Vlach people? There is no genetic connection between Croatian neither Serbs from Dalmatia with Aromanians, not in y dna neither autosomally.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks