| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 2,449 Given: 2,385 |
Originally Posted by Kipchak Håkan
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 5,410 Given: 6,858 |
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 5,566 Given: 4,506 |
But you are allowing this in Bosnia already! Filthy rich Arab Muslims have bought your land and women, and they have establish a base which they barely ever visit, and only for impregnating your women and for producing the future generations of Taliban and ISIS!!! We do not allow that in Greece, We are not Camel urine drinkers here, the Muslims have to adopt our ways, not the other way around as you suffer in Bosnia.We won't allow that, we don't want to end up like Greeks:
Saharid Greek Nazi (ROFL!!!)
Greek Levantines
wtf Greeks?
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 5,566 Given: 4,506 |
Really? Unfortunately, your blabbering doesn't count as science. Read and cry...WE PALEOAFRICANS WUZ KANGS
WE PALEOAFRICANS WUZ KURGANS
naze naze KURGAN warra warra KURGAN ho ha ho !
HORRO KURGAN
HORRROOO KURGAN
WUUARRA KURGAN Hoooo!
_____________________________
p.s.: I am not sure, do we mean the same culture?
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...enomics-battle
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 5,566 Given: 4,506 |
Alinei was a deluded idiot:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleol...tinuity_Theory
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-...tinuity_TheoryThe Paleolithic Continuity Theory (or PCT; Italian: La teoria della continuità), since 2010 relabelled as a "paradigm", as in Paleolithic Continuity Paradigm or PCP), is a hypothesis suggesting that the Proto-Indo-European language (PIE) can be traced back to the Upper Paleolithic, several millennia earlier than the Chalcolithic or at the most Neolithic estimates in other scenarios of Proto-Indo-European origins.As advanced by Mario Alinei in his Origini delle Lingue d’Europa (Origins of the Languages of Europe), published in two volumes in 1996 and 2000,[1] the PCT posits that the advent of Indo-European languages should be linked to the arrival of Homo sapiens in Europe, at around 40,000 years ago. Employing "lexical periodisation", Alinei arrives at a timeline deeper than even that of Colin Renfrew's Anatolian hypothesis, previously the mainstream linguistic theory proposing the earliest origin for Indo-European.[2]
Since 2004, an informal workgroup of scholars who support the Paleolithic Continuity Theory has been held online.[3] Members of the group (referred to as "Scientific Committee" in the website) include linguists Xaverio Ballester (University of Valencia) and Francesco Benozzo (University of Bologna), prehistorian Marcel Otte (Université de Liège) and anthropologist Henry Harpending (University of Utah).[4]
The Paleolithic Continuity Theory is distinctly a minority view as it enjoys very little academic support, serious discussion being limited to a small circle of scholars. It is not listed by Mallory among the proposals for the origins of the Indo-European languages that are widely discussed and considered credible within academia.[5]
Palaeolithic Continuity Theory[edit]
Main article: Paleolithic Continuity Theory
The "Paleolithic Continuity Paradigm" is a hypothesis suggesting that the Proto-Indo-European language (PIE) can be traced back to the Upper Paleolithic, several millennia earlier than the Chalcolithic or at the most Neolithic estimates in other scenarios of Proto-Indo-European origins. Its main proponents are Marcel Otte, Alexander Häusler,[2] and Mario Alinei.
The PCT posits that the advent of Indo-European languages should be linked to the arrival of Homo sapiens in Europe and Asia from Africa in the Upper Paleolithic.[55] Employing "lexical periodization", Alinei arrives at a timeline deeper than even that of Colin Renfrew's Anatolian hypothesis.[55][note 6]
Since 2004, an informal workgroup of scholars who support the Paleolithic Continuity hypothesis has been held online.[56] Apart from Alinei himself, its leading members (referred to as "Scientific Committee" in the website) are linguists Xaverio Ballester (University of Valencia) and Francesco Benozzo (University of Bologna). Also included are prehistorian Marcel Otte (Université de Liège) and anthropologist Henry Harpending (University of Utah).[55]
It is not listed by Mallory among the proposals for the origins of the Indo-European languages that are widely discussed and considered credible within academia.[57]
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 5,566 Given: 4,506 |
What a canine! He believes that his mythical ancestor, Tengri, a wolf, can bestow to him patience!!!
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 5,410 Given: 6,858 |
Typical derailing Petros Houhoulis as always
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 5,410 Given: 6,858 |
This quotation is based on a TYPICAL WIKIPEDIA FALSIFICATION, nice try pussy, I can give you 1 Mio more sources
still waiting for the refutation of my SCIENCE, this won't happen because you will not find Indo-European kurgan, since Indo-European don't even exist.
Last edited by Proto-Shaman; 03-28-2019 at 01:39 AM.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 5,410 Given: 6,858 |
HELLO I AM INDO-EUROPEAN AND I USE KURGAN
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 5,566 Given: 4,506 |
Well, go bitch at your Sultan to ban wikipedia once more!!!This quotation is based on a TYPICAL WIKIPEDIA FALSIFICATION, nice try pussy, I can give you 1 Mio more sources
still waiting for the refutation of my SCIENCE, this won't happen because you will not find Indo-European kurgan, since Indo-European don't even exist.
...And not just wikipedia. Also twitter and youtube!!!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Türkiye
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks