Which is genetically purer?

[Harkonnen]

ANE and ENA admixed Siberian or WHG and Basal Eurasian admixed Early European Farmer?

[Cristiano viejo]

Depends of the amount of admixture, obviously

[Harkonnen]

Depends of the amount of admixture, obviously

Admixture is admixture, but fact is ANE and ENA are more closely related genetic clades than WHG and BE. Also Mesolithic ANE Karelians were phenotypically closest to modern Siberians.

[Harkonnen]

We establish that no cranial data, whether the face and the neurocranium are analysed
together or separately, allow us to recover geographical relationships between the modern populations in our sample. Nevertheless,
clusters that have been recovered with the help of the whole cranium data correspond well with the expected generic relationships
between the sampled modern groups. As a result, we choose to analyse the shape of the complete cranium, where such is available,
in fossil individuals as well. Our results highlight a high level of variation within Mesolithic and within Neolithic populations of
the Eastern Europe and Siberia as compared with the pooled sample of the modern humans from different geographical locations
worldwide. However, a certain structure among the analysed groups can still be revealed. The results suggest that Mesolithic groups
from the Dnieper region have close morphological affinities with each other, while Yushny Oleni Ostrov have a large overlap with
modern humans in general and with some of the mongoloid groups in particular. Neolithic groups are, on the whole, closer to mod-
ern populations than to the Mesolithic sample. At the same time, Siberian individuals show a complex pattern of morphological
relationships which may be revealing of their genetic identity.

[Voskos]

EEF is more mixed.