0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,429 Given: 2,718 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,429 Given: 2,718 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,429 Given: 2,718 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,449 Given: 2,385 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,385 Given: 2,855 |
What works for a certain ethnicity, doesn't work for another. Tajiks are very related to Iranians, but Tajiks are not very related to Levantines for instance, whereas Iranians are related to Levantines to a degree. My point is that you have to draw a line somewhere and for me that line doesn't begin in Casablanca and ends in Kabul like you would suggest.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,429 Given: 2,718 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,429 Given: 2,718 |
Tajiks are Iranians as much as Persians or Kurds are. These synthetic border lines mean nothing.
I do agree with you though. We can exclude Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, Uzbeks etc but Tajiks, Afghans, and some Turkmen are very related to MENA History through their Iranic connection. One can deny this for his own small nation nationalism syndrome but that wont change the history.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks