Light eyes map of Europe (detail, scientifically backed)

[Laag]

According to Vitov 82,2% of Komi-Zyrians (he examined the Komi from Izhemsky and Ust-Vymsky districts) are light eyed (6-12 on Bunak scale). According to Cheboksarov 49,18 % of Komi-Zyrians have light eyes(9-12) 44,3% mixed eyes(5-8)and 6,52% dark eyes ( 1-4 on the Bunak scale). According to ToeKneeHwin 38% of the Komi are light eyed. But he does not indicate what kind of the Komi he is talking about. Even for Komi-Permyaks his numbers are very low.

[Lucas]

ToeKneeHwin's numbers aren't from averaging studies(which is problematic especially for hair colour because of definition) but looking at pictures himself. Again, he may've just done anyone from Karelia rather than actual ethnic Karelians, whose numbers are only 60k.

The same for Komi.

[Lucas]

Second study seems most legit to me, it doesn't have an extremely vague "mixed eyes". Poland is definitely around 70%.

Nope look carefully at the table. First study has every 16 colors counted separately. And their sample size is 27 times larger then second which dismiss it easily.

I don, t knwo why supercomputer trusts studies from Poland which has small sample size and color estimated without proper Martin scale.

[Laag]

ToeKneeHwin's numbers aren't from averaging studies(which is problematic especially for hair colour because of definition) but looking at pictures himself. Again, he may've just done anyone from Karelia rather than actual ethnic Karelians, whose numbers are only 60k.

The same for Komi.

In this case based on my Komi girls classification threads 100% of Komi girls are gray/blue eyed.

[Supercomputer]

His data for Eastern Europe seems totally wrong. For example, for Karelians, he gives a figure of 68%. According to Russian anthropologist Vitov 87,2% of Karelians have light eyes (6-12 on Bunak scale).

Here's his study work.
https://www.twirpx.com/file/2090649/
Also he have data for Russians. His work is valuable because he gives percentages for each eye color.

Numbers for small and less known ethnic groups are less reliable. That doesn't mean his numbers for large European countries are also.

Just as I thought ToeKneeHwin takes data from Russian sources and thinks that light eyes includes all light eyes but in Russian anthropology light eyes are only 9-12 on Bunak scale.

I don' think he took data from scientific sources. Back in 2010 when his data came out there was much less scientific studies available on forums such as this one.

[Supercomputer]

First study is most legit because of huge sample size and people were from all over the country. Also strict Martin scale was used. Survey was taken after war in 1955 - 1956.

71% for first study is too low even if you combine men ans women. Even if you count as light 8-16. Can you explain?

Ups it's 72,4. I was 1% off.

[Supercomputer]

I've found theses recents stats on Spain eye colors

https://www.casacochecurro.com/ojos-...espanoles.html

16,3% azul-gris (blue and grey)
55,2% ojos avellana – verde avellana (light brown, hazel and greenish)
28,5% marrón-negro (brown-black)

I hate when they do such awkward combining. Totally different looking eyes (medium brown and green) together in the same category.

[Supercomputer]

Nope look carefully at the table. First study has every 16 colors counted separately. And their sample size is 27 times larger then second which dismiss it easily.

I don, t knwo why supercomputer trusts studies from Poland which has small sample size and color estimated without proper Martin scale.

What do you mean I trust the small studies? I didn't ignore that large study, in fact my map is based off it.

[Visage pâle]

I hate when they do such awkward combining. Totally different looking eyes (medium brown and green) together in the same category.

Sadly most anthropologists studies (especially in 19th and early 20th century) didn't include the "green category".

[Lucas]

What do you mean I trust the small studies? I didn't ignore that large study, in fact my map is based off it.

If yes ok. On map I can't tell the difference between 68 or 72. I thought you averaged those three studies or some other.