0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 265 Given: 11 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,797 Given: 2,465 |
Meryemgul is probably how ancient Kipchak-Cuman people looked like. Because they were described as "blonde" by many neighboring nations for many times. But I think they still looked very different from Germanic & Slavic populations they've met.
Also I don't agree Volga Tatars are pure Turkic either. The purest Tatars are (for me) Crimean Steppe & Lipka Tatars. Correct me if I'm wrong
Thumbs Up |
Received: 265 Given: 11 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,748 Given: 9,033 |
Tbh i really doubt that Cumans were predominantly blond, at least not those ethnic Cumans. Blondism with Turanid look is really rare among Turkics, they were probably mixed with Ugrics or others. Bashkirs for example are one of the most Steppe shifted Turkics and nevertheless still look like lighter version of Central Asia but nothing more.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 265 Given: 11 |
I will correct. Steppe Crimean Tatars are actually Nogais. Their clans - Shirin, Argun, Baryn are possibly of Mongolian origin(Mongols have the same clans).
Read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nogais
Thumbs Up |
Received: 15,592 Given: 8,909 |
Well, it may be small, I don't know. But fact is Tatars have a lot more European in them (autosomally and in terms of Y DNA) than many people realize. Usually it's us who are trolled and scorned as Tatar mixed bastards and some shit like that (people who say so are either ignorant or malicious). And based on DNA studies we have practically nothing Mongolian in us. Sure, modern Russians have more Mongloid admixture than other Europeans except Finno-Ugrics but that has nothing to do with the Golden Horde. Even to this day Volga Tatars are still heavily concentrated in the Volga and Ural Federal Districts, like 80+% of them live between Penza and Tyumen (these claims are easy to fact-check).
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,748 Given: 9,033 |
You shouldn’t take trolls serious. It’s clear Russians have no Mongolian admixture. I rather use the term east eurasian than mongoloid like west eurasian instead of Caucasian. Golden horde was a Turkomongol-confederation and didnt left any genetic trace. Like i said, Turkic admixture of Russian Turkics mostly came from Bulgars but also from Khazars. Mongols only left genetic impact to Kazakhs, Kirgiz and Hazaras. That east eurasian admixture of some people for example Uzbeks or other people in Central Asia comes from Mongols is a myth.
@Edgü i reported you, its not funny anymore.
Last edited by Mejgusu; 01-12-2021 at 03:43 PM.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 11,836 Given: 7,303 |
Yes:
Explanation of references
Spoiler!
Although Uralic-like admixture is naturally part of Turkic groups, Chuvash and Volga Tatars have increased scores. Therewithal, the Kazan Tatars model like a mix of Turkic, Uralic, and Slavic. Chuvashes turns out to be fully Uralic except for a negligible amount of Turkic. Crimean, Lipka, and Mishar Tatars also have the "native" admixture.
qpAdm: Bulgarian_1.DG= 77 - Kimak.SG= 23, p= 0.36, se= 0.31.
Y: Q-L330 > Q-YP771 > Q-BZ180 > Q-F16045* (F15008*) --> Baikal N, Altai MLBA, Aldy-Bel, Pazyryk, Hun.
MT: K1a --> Iron Gates, Starcevo, Bulgaria N, Bulgaria CA, Bulgaria BA.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 15,592 Given: 8,909 |
Well, didn't Mongols actually settle in parts of Central Asia? In Russians it's definitely a myth (first Western European, then specifically promoted by both the Nazis and the Soviets). But Uzbeks for example have a lot of C, O. Not to mention the Hazaras who are known for their Mongolian ancestry.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 15,592 Given: 8,909 |
Edgü, you can thumb down once or twice but don't do that too often, buddy.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks