Page 10 of 15 FirstFirst ... 67891011121314 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 141

Thread: Which Turkic ethnicity is genetically closest to Proto Turks?

  1. #91
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Last Online
    12-21-2022 @ 02:03 PM
    Ethnicity
    t
    Country
    Russia
    Gender
    Posts
    563
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 265
    Given: 11

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Leto View Post
    The word you were looking for is "admixture", not "impurities"
    Yes, I forgot this word and used a translator.

  2. #92
    Veteran Member Sora's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Last Online
    04-11-2024 @ 11:41 AM
    Location
    Istanbul(real life) / Seoul(in dreams)
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Turkic + Native Anatolian & some Iranic
    Ethnicity
    Turkish(50% Central Anatolian + 25% Chepni + 18.75% Meskhetian) + distant Kurdish(6.25%)
    Ancestry
    Central Asia(Oghuz w some Kipchak) & Anatolia(mostly Hittite) with distant Zagrosia
    Country
    Turkey
    Y-DNA
    Oghuz Khagan
    mtDNA
    Empress Ashina
    Taxonomy
    Alpine-Pontid + Turanid
    Politics
    Kemalism, Patriotism & anti-Oppaism
    Hero
    1. Mustafa Kemal Atatürk 2. Empress Ashina 3. Alper Gezeravcı 4. Verona Petrova
    Religion
    Islam
    Relationship Status
    Married to a haplo O in the parallel universe
    Age
    21
    Gender
    Posts
    3,735
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,797
    Given: 2,465

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Meryemgul is probably how ancient Kipchak-Cuman people looked like. Because they were described as "blonde" by many neighboring nations for many times. But I think they still looked very different from Germanic & Slavic populations they've met.

    Also I don't agree Volga Tatars are pure Turkic either. The purest Tatars are (for me) Crimean Steppe & Lipka Tatars. Correct me if I'm wrong
    Ask Sora: https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...-Sora-anything

    Quote Originally Posted by Dr_Maul
    Good observation Sheikh

  3. #93
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Last Online
    12-21-2022 @ 02:03 PM
    Ethnicity
    t
    Country
    Russia
    Gender
    Posts
    563
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 265
    Given: 11

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Leto View Post
    A lot of captives from Russia were brought there, some of them must have been Islamicized.
    Based on haplogroups, Russian-Slavic genetic contribution to the Tatars is very small. It's good that there is modern genetic research and we can reject some myths.

  4. #94
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Last Online
    03-19-2024 @ 10:52 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    insan
    Ethnicity
    @
    Country
    Antarctica
    Gender
    Posts
    3,059
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 3,748
    Given: 9,033

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sora View Post
    Meryemgul is probably how ancient Kipchak-Cuman people looked like. Because they were described as "blonde" by many neighboring nations for many times. But I think they still looked very different from Germanic & Slavic populations they've met.

    Also I don't agree Volga Tatars are pure Turkic either. The purest Tatars are (for me) Crimean Steppe & Lipka Tatars. Correct me if I'm wrong
    Tbh i really doubt that Cumans were predominantly blond, at least not those ethnic Cumans. Blondism with Turanid look is really rare among Turkics, they were probably mixed with Ugrics or others. Bashkirs for example are one of the most Steppe shifted Turkics and nevertheless still look like lighter version of Central Asia but nothing more.

  5. #95
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Last Online
    12-21-2022 @ 02:03 PM
    Ethnicity
    t
    Country
    Russia
    Gender
    Posts
    563
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 265
    Given: 11

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sora View Post

    Also I don't agree Volga Tatars are pure Turkic either. The purest Tatars are (for me) Crimean Steppe & Lipka Tatars. Correct me if I'm wrong
    I will correct. Steppe Crimean Tatars are actually Nogais. Their clans - Shirin, Argun, Baryn are possibly of Mongolian origin(Mongols have the same clans).
    Read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nogais

  6. #96
    Not even a member
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Last Online
    04-27-2024 @ 09:40 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Indo-European, Slavic
    Ethnicity
    Russian
    Country
    Brunei
    Region
    Russian Turkestan General Governorship
    Y-DNA
    R1a-YP270
    Religion
    Orthodox
    Gender
    Posts
    24,142
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 15,592
    Given: 8,909

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chelubey View Post
    Based on haplogroups, Russian-Slavic genetic contribution to the Tatars is very small. It's good that there is modern genetic research and we can reject some myths.
    Well, it may be small, I don't know. But fact is Tatars have a lot more European in them (autosomally and in terms of Y DNA) than many people realize. Usually it's us who are trolled and scorned as Tatar mixed bastards and some shit like that (people who say so are either ignorant or malicious). And based on DNA studies we have practically nothing Mongolian in us. Sure, modern Russians have more Mongloid admixture than other Europeans except Finno-Ugrics but that has nothing to do with the Golden Horde. Even to this day Volga Tatars are still heavily concentrated in the Volga and Ural Federal Districts, like 80+% of them live between Penza and Tyumen (these claims are easy to fact-check).

  7. #97
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Last Online
    03-19-2024 @ 10:52 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    insan
    Ethnicity
    @
    Country
    Antarctica
    Gender
    Posts
    3,059
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 3,748
    Given: 9,033

    3 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Leto View Post
    Well, it may be small, I don't know. But fact is Tatars have a lot more European in them (autosomally and in terms of Y DNA) than many people realize. Usually it's us who are trolled and scorned as Tatar mixed bastards and some shit like that (people who say so are either ignorant or malicious). And based on DNA studies we have practically nothing Mongolian in us. Sure, modern Russians have more Mongloid admixture than other Europeans except Finno-Ugrics but that has nothing to do with the Golden Horde. Even to this day Volga Tatars are still heavily concentrated in the Volga and Ural Federal Districts, like 80+% of them live between Penza and Tyumen (these claims are easy to fact-check).
    You shouldn’t take trolls serious. It’s clear Russians have no Mongolian admixture. I rather use the term east eurasian than mongoloid like west eurasian instead of Caucasian. Golden horde was a Turkomongol-confederation and didnt left any genetic trace. Like i said, Turkic admixture of Russian Turkics mostly came from Bulgars but also from Khazars. Mongols only left genetic impact to Kazakhs, Kirgiz and Hazaras. That east eurasian admixture of some people for example Uzbeks or other people in Central Asia comes from Mongols is a myth.

    @Edgü i reported you, its not funny anymore.
    Last edited by Mejgusu; 01-12-2021 at 03:43 PM.

  8. #98
    Veteran Member
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Kaspias's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Ankara
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Rumelian
    Ethnicity
    Balkan Turkish, Pomak
    Country
    Turkey
    Y-DNA
    Q-F16045
    mtDNA
    K1a
    Gender
    Posts
    7,446
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 11,836
    Given: 7,303

    3 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chelubey View Post
    This is too bold a statement. Can you prove it?
    Yes:



    Explanation of references

    Spoiler!


    Although Uralic-like admixture is naturally part of Turkic groups, Chuvash and Volga Tatars have increased scores. Therewithal, the Kazan Tatars model like a mix of Turkic, Uralic, and Slavic. Chuvashes turns out to be fully Uralic except for a negligible amount of Turkic. Crimean, Lipka, and Mishar Tatars also have the "native" admixture.
    qpAdm: Bulgarian_1.DG= 77 - Kimak.SG= 23, p= 0.36, se= 0.31.
    Y: Q-L330 > Q-YP771 > Q-BZ180 > Q-F16045* (F15008*) --> Baikal N, Altai MLBA, Aldy-Bel, Pazyryk, Hun.
    MT: K1a --> Iron Gates, Starcevo, Bulgaria N, Bulgaria CA, Bulgaria BA.

  9. #99
    Not even a member
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Last Online
    04-27-2024 @ 09:40 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Indo-European, Slavic
    Ethnicity
    Russian
    Country
    Brunei
    Region
    Russian Turkestan General Governorship
    Y-DNA
    R1a-YP270
    Religion
    Orthodox
    Gender
    Posts
    24,142
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 15,592
    Given: 8,909

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gecko View Post
    You shouldn’t take trolls serious. It’s clear Russians have no Mongolian admixture. I rather use the term east eurasian than mongoloid like west eurasian instead of Caucasian. Golden horde was a Turkomongol-confederation and didnt left any genetic trace. Like i said, Turkic admixture of Russian Turkics mostly came from Bulgars but also from Khazars. Mongols only left genetic impact to Kazakhs, Kirgiz and Hazaras. That east eurasian admixture of some people for example Uzbeks or other people who in Central Asia cones from Mongols is a myth.

    @Edgü i reported you, its not funny anymore.
    Well, didn't Mongols actually settle in parts of Central Asia? In Russians it's definitely a myth (first Western European, then specifically promoted by both the Nazis and the Soviets). But Uzbeks for example have a lot of C, O. Not to mention the Hazaras who are known for their Mongolian ancestry.

  10. #100
    Not even a member
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Last Online
    04-27-2024 @ 09:40 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Indo-European, Slavic
    Ethnicity
    Russian
    Country
    Brunei
    Region
    Russian Turkestan General Governorship
    Y-DNA
    R1a-YP270
    Religion
    Orthodox
    Gender
    Posts
    24,142
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 15,592
    Given: 8,909

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Edgü, you can thumb down once or twice but don't do that too often, buddy.

Page 10 of 15 FirstFirst ... 67891011121314 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-17-2021, 10:47 AM
  2. Replies: 44
    Last Post: 11-02-2018, 11:49 PM
  3. Replies: 46
    Last Post: 08-13-2018, 06:02 AM
  4. Is R1a really of Proto-Turkic origin, or no?
    By Vlatko Vukovic in forum Y-DNA
    Replies: 93
    Last Post: 11-02-2017, 09:04 PM
  5. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-23-2017, 01:28 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •