0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 20,922 Given: 18,998 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 37 Given: 31 |
TV documentaries aren't a reliable source for information, in general. Also, the scientists who claim that the shroud is legitimately Christ's seem to be victims of confirmation bias, imo.
No harm in discussing it though.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,216 Given: 5,754 |
Is there a Gedmatch ID?
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,284 Given: 4,691 |
I have a video of the announcement that was done from the Genetic study. The Druze MT was from the man whose blood was found on the shroud. Most of the genetic markers were middle eastern, especially the older ones. They were shorter and not as complete as the, newer, European ones. Nearly half of the individuals were from India, as the Sindarin cloth was produced there.
Anyway, I obviously believe in its authenticity because of the great number of miracles involved in creating it (it's not been recreated by anyone), and its uniqueness. I don't see why God wouldn't leave proof of his divinity and Resurrection, as he was perfectly happy to show St. Thomas his sides and hands as proof. I don't worship the cloth and neither do I depend on it for my faith.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,284 Given: 4,691 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks