Do you find sandals on men unattractive?

[The Lawspeaker]

They are something to be worn on the beach or on the boulevard when you walk back to your hotel. Anything beyond 50m in the opposite direction should be considered no go unless you're in a country where wearing them in public is considered normal (or even the norm). And no socks - unless you're in a country where you have a real mosquito problem and then you would be better off wearing shoes.

[smurph]

Sandals are sexy on men because men's hairy feet are sexy. It's a gay look. As a gay man from Ireland I dig that look.

Jandals or barefooted in summer. That includes down the mall or in town.

The fuck is a jandal?

[Zuh]

Male feet are attractive sandals or no sandals.

[Rouxinol]

It depends on the sandals and on the man wearing them. I prefer flip flops though, on the beach and by the pool.

[Papastratosels26]

Don't like.

[KMack]

They are something to be worn on the beach or on the boulevard when you walk back to your hotel. Anything beyond 50m in the opposite direction should be considered no go unless you're in a country where wearing them in public is considered normal (or even the norm). And no socks - unless you're in a country where you have a real mosquito problem and then you would be better off wearing shoes.

https://www.foxnews.com/great-outdoors/s...ming-hiker

Quote:
One Arizona law enforcement official has insisted that his sheriff’s office never intended to “sandal shame” a female hiker on social media, who had to be rescued from a treacherous 10-mile hike after struggling to continue due to her inadequate footwear. Instead, the officer claimed that they simply shared the cautionary tale to warn others.

Quote:
“This hiker failed to take the posted warnings seriously as she and seven others had to be rescued out of Fossil Creek yesterday. Definitely not appropriate footwear for the ten mile hike,” reps for the department wrote online, sharing images of a woman’s feet in stylish, albeit delicate, ankle-wrap sandals.


Quote:
Others, meanwhile, accused the GCSO of “sandal shaming” the naïve hiker, Yahoo Lifestyle reports.

In response, Undersheriff Michael L. Johnson of the department told the outlet that officials only want to keep people safe, a message especially poignant to communicate regarding the dangers of the ever-popular Fossil Creek Trail.

“We try not to embarrass people or anything like that. We just want to get the information out there for people to take it seriously,” Johnson said of their decision to share the story.

According to the official, on April 26, a group of eight people (including the “sandal-shamed” woman) ranging in age from 10 to 36, ventured five miles down the Fossil Creek Trail and attempted to turn around at about 4 p.m.

Things quickly went south when they realized they’d need a rescue, due in part to the woman’s sandals that made it “nearly impossible” for her to climb back up the trail, as per Yahoo.

“We arrived about 5:00 at the trail head and were able to get down to the bottom by 6:00. And then, once we got them some electrolytes and got them rehydrated, the rescue was just working our way out with them slowly,” Johnson recalled. “I think they hit the top of the mountain about 9:45 that night.”

The woman’s shoes were eventually bolstered with medical tape by a search and rescue team member, and the group eventually made it out of the woods without issue.

[The Lawspeaker]

https://www.foxnews.com/great-outdoors/s...ming-hiker

Quote:
One Arizona law enforcement official has insisted that his sheriff’s office never intended to “sandal shame” a female hiker on social media, who had to be rescued from a treacherous 10-mile hike after struggling to continue due to her inadequate footwear. Instead, the officer claimed that they simply shared the cautionary tale to warn others.

Quote:
“This hiker failed to take the posted warnings seriously as she and seven others had to be rescued out of Fossil Creek yesterday. Definitely not appropriate footwear for the ten mile hike,” reps for the department wrote online, sharing images of a woman’s feet in stylish, albeit delicate, ankle-wrap sandals.


Quote:
Others, meanwhile, accused the GCSO of “sandal shaming” the naïve hiker, Yahoo Lifestyle reports.

In response, Undersheriff Michael L. Johnson of the department told the outlet that officials only want to keep people safe, a message especially poignant to communicate regarding the dangers of the ever-popular Fossil Creek Trail.

“We try not to embarrass people or anything like that. We just want to get the information out there for people to take it seriously,” Johnson said of their decision to share the story.

According to the official, on April 26, a group of eight people (including the “sandal-shamed” woman) ranging in age from 10 to 36, ventured five miles down the Fossil Creek Trail and attempted to turn around at about 4 p.m.

Things quickly went south when they realized they’d need a rescue, due in part to the woman’s sandals that made it “nearly impossible” for her to climb back up the trail, as per Yahoo.

“We arrived about 5:00 at the trail head and were able to get down to the bottom by 6:00. And then, once we got them some electrolytes and got them rehydrated, the rescue was just working our way out with them slowly,” Johnson recalled. “I think they hit the top of the mountain about 9:45 that night.”

The woman’s shoes were eventually bolstered with medical tape by a search and rescue team member, and the group eventually made it out of the woods without issue.

Only a retard would use sandals on a hiking trail.

[Magnolia]

Usually yes... but it depends on the complete man's fashion style..

This is OK

[Finnish Swede]

Only a retard would use sandals on a hiking trail.

Not a hiking trail, but some of them are good then you stop for the night (erect your tent, cook, rest after long day). Of course depending of the weather.

[Impaler]

I have never wore sandals since when I was a kid. Not my style to wear sandals, I find it very gayish.