2
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 15,330 Given: 9,886 |
(POLL) Was colonization of non whites a good or bad thing for the World?
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 2,473 Given: 10,006 |
For us: worst thing.
For them: a great thing.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 8,160 Given: 3,931 |
This map is not accurate. Ottoman Empire wasn’t a part of colonists.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 15,330 Given: 9,886 |
Why? Ottomans colonized arabs.Originally Posted by itilvolga
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 3,430 Given: 2,719 |
Iranic plateau in its modern form has never been colonized by any white country. We have been colonizers ourselves though (look at my signature).
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 3,430 Given: 2,719 |
It's not colonization. They shared faith, customs, social values, even ethnically all MENAS are kinda similar with massive overlaps.
German occupation of france was colonization as well ?
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 8,160 Given: 3,931 |
No, according to International System, it was a politics of conquering instead of colonisation. We didn’t interfere their culture, beliefs, social life etc. and they were not limited at all.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 3,430 Given: 2,719 |
yes more of an administrative and military control.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 8,158 Given: 4,510 |
yeah but technically you were colonized by Andronovo Aryans from the Russian/Kazakh steppe
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 522 Given: 315 |
Not true. It were actually the BMAC Aryans and Aryans from the Iranian Plateau who colonized the Steppes.
It was actually the Yamnaya (for a huge part West Asian) that colonized Europe.
And before Yamnaya it were the Anatolian farmers who colonized Europe
etc.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks