Originally Posted by
The Lawspeaker
It's the same with our monarchy:
Louis Napoleon (House Bonaparte) - a peculiar individual with good ideas who wasted a lot of money but who created some of the first national institutions.
Willem I (House of Orange-Nassau) was an outstanding monarch (although he f.... up the whole Belgian affair)
Willem II was half-way decent (he was a good soldier, not a brilliant administrator but at least he became a constitutional monarch)
Willem III was terrible.
Wilhelmina fled to the UK in 1940 together with the government in direct violation of the constitution (article repealed in 1983),
Juliana was half-way decent but not much use,
Beatrix ? I'll think we should leave that one to 21th century historians but this whole Bilderberg thing stinks.
Willem-Alexander (who even refused the title of Willem IV) .. not much going on there
The Stadtholders:
Willem de Zwijger (William the Silent) ? Some men call him a hero, some men condemn him for his actions in the South.
Maurice ? A brilliant general (that's for sure) but a terrible politician and his policies in the South leave much to be desired for.
Willem II - godawful. Tried to stage a coup d'etat but thankfully died soon after.
Willem III - a bit like Maurice. With him the Golden Age certainly came to an end.
Willem IV - that was a right ineffectual nightmare.
Willem V - could it be any worse ? he went to war with the French Republic and got seen off. Fled to England and left us to the invader. He pulled a Wilhelmina on us before it was cool.
Bookmarks