Do you think trips in time are scientifically possible?

[Ruggery]

Traveling or propelling an object at or beyond the speed of light would require an infinite energy source, so using a wormhole or black hole is the only real alternative.

Okay, but we still do not know how black holes work from within, we are at an extremely early stage and our pace is moving a little slow. If we manage to leave the solar system by the orifice method, it is likely to take at least 800 years (unless we invent a way to use the journey of light, which seems impossible).

[Outlaw]

the idea of it is very tempting so are multiverses and that kinda stuff

[Morena]

Give me a summary of why you believe that.

I don't believe the past exists in a material sense, so there is no going back to it.

[Ruggery]

the idea of it is very tempting so are multiverses and that kinda stuff

Both things could be considered for the future (but I think that one not very close)

[Ruggery]

I don't believe the past exists in a material sense, so there is no going back to it.

At the moment, it has not been proven physically or scientifically, but in the future it can be discovered. (Perhaps one of the reasons why scientists do not want to investigate it is because the line of the past would be too dangerous if you could travel).

[ixulescu]

If there would be a possibility to travel in the future, does it imply that future already exists?

[Ruggery]

If there would be a possibility to travel in the future, does it imply that future already exists?

Of course, the future exists,
If there future was not how we would live?

[The Lawspeaker]

No.

[ixulescu]

Of course, the future exists,
If there future was not how we would live?

What do you mean? The causes of the present are in the past, not future.

[Ruggery]

What do you mean? The causes of the present are in the past, not future.

And the future is formed with what we do and will do.