Are the Serbians and Romanians cultural genetical anthropological brothers ?

[PaleoEuropean]

If you are referring to the actual native Cro-magnon descendants, the answer is yes, other people are a patchwork of immigrants not consistently found there before the 19th century.

[Adam Janossy]

Dude, you know fuck nothing about your own country.

All those churches were reconstructed in the 19th century.
They looked nothing like the present state.

for instance this:





looked like this before the 19th century:

Neither church were really different and smaller. To tell the truth you are envy because you have semi-asian small hovels...

[Pribislav]

Neither church were really different and smaller. To tell the truth you are envy because you have semi-asian small hovels...

https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...is-a-Balkanite

[Alenka]

If you are referring to the actual native Cro-magnon descendants, the answer is yes, other people are a patchwork of immigrants not consistently found there before the 19th century.

Not sure what you're referring to, but if you meant this for Uralid then that's inaccurate. It's not a Cromagnid phenotype. It's a prediminantly Mongoloid phenotype. The Caucasoid input is minor and rather undetectable to the average Caucasoid observer. In the USA, these people would probably be mistaken for Native American or even Japanese. The Uralid phenotype is just becoming increasingly rare due to intermarriage.

[Alenka]

That was Uralid 100 years ago in some remote Siberian village.
These peoples' descendants living in large Siberian cities today look much different.

These examples I posted on the previous page are Khanty and Mansi who are native to West Siberia. Uralid is a contact race with a predominantly Mongoloid phenotype as defined by anthropologists and the definition doesn't change, the phenotype simply becomes more rare due to intermarriage with Russians and other Caucasoids.

But it's not like they don't exist anymore. Here is a Khanty woman in recent pictures, she is a good example of Uralid phenotype.



Here she is with her daughter who has a Latvian father.






I think the daughter looks mostly Nordid/East-Baltid with only residual Uralid.

Here on this group picture you can compare her with others.
In the back:
- dressed in red cardigan is she the half Khanty/Latvian
- the guy standing next to her in hoodie UNBC is Anglo-Canadian
- the woman next to him with glasses is Ukrainian
- the man further next is Russian
In the front:
- woman on the right who is holding a child is Ukrainian
- woman on the left is Nenets
Nenets people are Uraloid by phenotype as classified by anthropologists, and their territory stretches as west as the northeasternmost part of European Russia. Just like the Khanty mother, the Nenets woman is another good example of Uralid.

[PaleoEuropean]

Not sure what you're referring to, but if you meant this for Uralid then that's inaccurate. It's not a Cromagnid phenotype. It's a prediminantly Mongoloid phenotype. The Caucasoid input is minor and rather undetectable to the average Caucasoid observer. In the USA, these people would probably be mistaken for Native American or even Japanese. The Uralid phenotype is just becoming increasingly rare due to intermarriage.

I am talking about Cro-Magnon lineages Haplogroup I and U

[ixulescu]

Neither church were really different and smaller. To tell the truth you are envy because you have semi-asian small hovels...

It's one and the same church lol before and after modification. But nobody expects you to be able to tell the difference.

[RN97]

I still think that Serbs are closer to Croats than to Romanians overall in spite of what anthrotard PCA maps show. This is due to three main factors;
1. Height: Romanians tend to be on the shorter side, males around 175 cm, whilst both Croats and Serbs average over 180 cm
2. Language: Yes, I know, religiously Romanians are closer, but I think that language is at least as important as it's the main tool for mutual understanding.
3. Looks: This might just be subjective, but apart from height, I feel like Croats and Serbs look more alike facially than Romanians and Serbs.
Even still, yes, Romanians and Serbs have a very, very similar culture at least.

[Adam Janossy]

It's one and the same church lol before and after modification. But nobody expects you to be able to tell the difference.

There were no any major modificatrion. You had not even stone masons to create normal cathedrals. It is not strange because Romanians were late nomadic society until the early modern period, where the 80% of the people were shepherd.

[ixulescu]

There were no any major modificatrion. You had not even stone masons to create normal cathedrals. It is not strange because Romanians were late nomadic society until the early modern period, where the 80% of the people were shepherd.

Incorrect on every single account.
That church was extensively modified and had the towers, roof and interior rebuilt. Btw, that church was the largest built in Medieval Hungary. The surface of the nave was somewhat larger than that of contemporary Romanian churches, but not particularly large.

Traditionally Romanians had lots of stone masons and wood carvers. Transylvania was built by Romanian stone masons. This is the reason why Romanians were not allowed to built in stone in Transylvanian cities - because they would have outbuilt anyone else. This policy kept Romanians rural in Transylvania, but always with a higher natality. It basically delivered Transylvania on a plate to Romanians.

Balkan shepherds always practiced vertical transhumance, in which only the herds move up and down the mountain, but shepherds families lived in permanent homes at the bottom of the mountains. Saying that these shepherds were nomadic is like saying airline pilots are nomadic. It's idiotic - they have stable homes.

In addition, 80% of Romanians being shepherds is pure nonsense. This shows how little you know about Romanians diet, culture, economy etc. It would have been great if 80% of Romanians were shepherds, because shepherds were the richest peasants in Medieval times. But there was no economy to support this level of meat consumption. In reality, most Romanians were plowmen, like everywhere in Medieval Europe (esp in Eastern Europe).