2
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,703 Given: 5,603 |
I see. Well, maybe not country but regions or areas of that country. Some regions of Indonesia like Aceh in North Sumatra and probably certain regions of Peninsular Malaysia also have a lot of Caucasoid influence (mostly from either Indian or Arab traders).
In the case of Malaysia, there is a lot of Indian settlers from the British colonial period, so they could also get good amount of Caucasoid influence from Indians mixing with the locals.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,703 Given: 5,603 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,454 Given: 11,125 |
yeah rohingyas could be possible but there are huge tamil and some up/bihari communities there i think as well that were taken there during the colonization era and many just stayed there.
Malays i would say. could be indian settlers and the negrito mix. Cambodians and thais are very close as well though i think.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,348 Given: 722 |
I consistently get high SEA scores. Any idea why?
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,415 Given: 688 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,524 Given: 1,834 |
from the studies i read.. its around 3% of philippines have some sort of indian or arabs ancestry..
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,703 Given: 5,603 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,497 Given: 5,081 |
Filipinos are negroes even american amerindians have way more Caucasian admixture then them.
Getting back to the question I would say without a doubt Singaporeans.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks