0
Finno-Ugric
West Baltic
East Baltic
East Germanic
Norse/Scandinavian
Geto-Dacian-Thracian
Eastern Celtic
Albanian
Hellenic
Eastern Romance
Eastern Iranian
Turkic
Caucasic
Venetic
Irminonic
some (which?) combination of the above
other
Thumbs Up |
Received: 20,924 Given: 18,997 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 257 Given: 0 |
A great thread already ruined by the wuz
Thumbs Up |
Received: 20,924 Given: 18,997 |
True. West Slavs used to be known as Wends originally. The name Slavs was later transmitted on us from South Slavs.
I wanted to add Illyrians but apparently Illyrian language was already extinct at that time, apart from - possibly - one dialect, ancestral to Albanian.
The vast majority of Illyrians were already Romanized and spoke Latin at that time.
some Czech authors claim that the southern Slavs were called Serbs before they called Slavs.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 11,113 Given: 10,158 |
The Avars decimated the Romanised locals; they probably would of spread further without the Slavs crushing them. East Europe would be some gang bang of Avars, Mongols and Iranid Sarmatians.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,983 Given: 2,435 |
Not much would have changed.
Eastern Europe would have been dominated by the tribes already local. Thrachian, East Romance, Baltic (? not so sure here), East German, and Norse.
The livelihood of the Turkic tribes was tied to the steppe, and the steppe ends at the Carpathians.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks