NEPALI autosomal DNA

[Borealis]

Retarded, Nepalis are a diverse nation

[NPKTO]

The problem is it seems he used Lahu and Miazou (Hmong) as the reference for South-East Asian populations, however both of those groups have a documented historical migration from the north. Otherwise it's a pretty solid calculator.

My attention is focused on the decent amount of west+east European in the Nepalese. A clear sign of the Aryan cattle-drivers pushing deep into the Gangetic plain. It got me thinking that Nepali ruling class such as that which Buddha Sakhayumi descended from were even more high in west+east European components.

I think Nepalese samples were collected from hill (Himalayan) ethnic groups who have very complex stories of migration. I highly doubt Buddha would’ve been more Euro shifted than some of those samples (because he was born in part of Nepal which touches Gangetic Plains). Buddha would’ve probably scored like Uttar Pradesh Kshatriyas, perhaps less ASI shifted version of them.

[Voskos]

Most aryan/europid south asians are the gypsies.How funny is that?

[Adamastor]

Most aryan/europid south asians are the gypsies.How funny is that?

Only when heavily mixed with Europeans. Average Gypsies are less 'Aryan' than average upper caste South Asians, gypsies have a lot of MENA blood.


Nepalis, alongside Dardic groups, are indeed the least Australoid looking South Asians, they mostly look like a Caucasian - Mongoloid combination. The heavy Australoid types are very minoritary there, crossing India-Nepal border through Sonauli was like going from heaven to a hell of blackness.

[NPKTO]

Most aryan/europid south asians are the gypsies.How funny is that?

Gypsies are Europeans though. Most West shifted group in South Asia are pops like Kalash, Kho, Pak Pashtun (although they’re Iranic group), Balochi, Brahui, etc. These groups are quite heavy on Iranian Neolithic admixture. Ironically most Euro shifted groups are from Haryana Jat, Rajasthani Jat, and Ror who lived in the Gangetic Plains. But they’re not quite heavy on Iranian Neolithic.

[War Chef]

I think Nepalese samples were collected from hill (Himalayan) ethnic groups who have very complex stories of migration. I highly doubt Buddha would’ve been more Euro shifted than some of those samples (because he was born in part of Nepal which touches Gangetic Plains). Buddha would’ve probably scored like Uttar Pradesh Kshatriyas, perhaps less ASI shifted version of them.

Buddha was a Sakya noble - ruling elite. There's no doubt the ruling caste would've been closer genetically to the Vedic Indo-Aryans.

Here you can see the kingdom of Sakya at the foothills of the Himalayas.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...500_BCE%29.png

[Thambi]

I think Nepalese samples were collected from hill (Himalayan) ethnic groups who have very complex stories of migration. I highly doubt Buddha would’ve been more Euro shifted than some of those samples (because he was born in part of Nepal which touches Gangetic Plains). Buddha would’ve probably scored like Uttar Pradesh Kshatriyas, perhaps less ASI shifted version of them.

not just that, but the subcontinent was pretty much like brazil prior to caste system. people were already mixed prior to caste system and then later became endogamous.
https://www.livescience.com/38751-ge...m-origins.html

[Thambi]

Only when heavily mixed with Europeans. Average Gypsies are less 'Aryan' than average upper caste South Asians, gypsies have a lot of MENA blood.


Nepalis, alongside Dardic groups, are indeed the least Australoid looking South Asians, they mostly look like a Caucasian - Mongoloid combination. The heavy Australoid types are very minoritary there, crossing India-Nepal border through Sonauli was like going from heaven to a hell of blackness.

arent people near india/nepal border just madhesis? how did they suddenly turn from white to black lol? and many nepalis are dark as fuck. they have more differences in terms of features rather than skin tone compared to most northern indians.

[War Chef]

not just that, but the subcontinent was pretty much like brazil prior to caste system. people were already mixed prior to caste system and then later became endogamous.
https://www.livescience.com/38751-ge...m-origins.html

But in Brazil there are individuals of near pure central European stock. Bolonosaro for example

[Thambi]

But in Brazil there are individuals of near pure central European stock. Bolonosaro for example

but there are no pure steppe folks anywhere in south asia. highest steppe is among Rors of haryana and they have 40% max. Even kalash, northern pakstanis, pashtuns have less than them.

As I said, and gave you the link as well, the caste system appeared after mixing happened in south asia so the upper castes were heavily south asian already. caste system popped up later and that too based on occupation.

my point is all south asians became mixed prior to cast system and after that they became strictly endogamous. Sakhyas are right next to all UP kingdoms and there are texts regarding buddha's appearance and he did not look atypical for an south asian when he got enlightened in Bihar, India.