Sure, even though I doubt any evidence I give will convince you.
So, here is a PCA plot from a paper that Skoglund(the man you quoted) was involved in himself.
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/001552v4.full(from that paper)
It suffers from projection bias(Euro farmers should be even more below Sardinians, not above them, Sardinians do have a tiny bit of steppe, and SHG is way too close to modern Europeans), common for some of the earlier PCAs(I only chose this one because the man you quoted was involved, and the lead of the project was Iosif Lazaridis, whom you can't accuse of pushing "Nordicist propaganda" on the ethnogenesis of southern Euros) but overall it still points out what it's trying to point out, and is overall accurate.
You can see where Cypriots, Sardinians, and other European populations plot based on autosomal DNA. There are, I don't know, atleast a dozen European ethnicities closer to Europe's original farmers than Cypriots. Were they southern European? Absolutely, Sardinians, Bergamo Italians, Albanians and Iberians have the most admixture from them and are also the closest. Cypriots? No. Swedish farmers specifically were even way more northern shifted, closest to Basques, because the farmers mixed with native Europeans, the basis of the European race, WHGs, while migrating north.
I will now explain to you why Skoglund mentioned Cypriots being among the closest to neolithic farmers in 2014. In 2014, we had very little ancient DNA. We had 2 WHGs, ANE, neolithic farmers from central Europe, Yamnaya and that's about it. Despite the PCA clearly showing differently(and geneticists did show their reserves about this), if you run populations with admixture based on only those populations, it's going to pick the closest available. In 2014, technically Saudi fucking Arabians were more European farmer than Sardinians. Skoglund said it because European farmers did come from Anatolia and didn't think that ancient Middle-Easterners would've been different. Cypriots also have some of the least ANE in the Middle-East(reminder that Cyprus is a both geographically and genetically a Middle-Eastern population), so they scored more of the closest available source from the very few options available, European farmers.
Here's an outdated map of EEF admixture from 2014(Eupedia still has this garbage up):
Does this make sense to you? Are Saudis the purest Mediterraneans?
As we got more relevant samples, specifically relevant to Cypriots, other Southern Europeans and other post-neolithic migrations from the Near-East, such as CHG, Iran_neolithic, Natufians from the Levant, it became clear most of the ancestry of the Near-East wasn't European/Anatolian farmer, but naturally, people from those areas that were previously unsampled, and were more southern shifted because of less paleolithic Euro/WHG admixture than in West Anatolia. Cyprus, naturally being closer to the Levant than West Anatolia, obviously would have admixture from there, and more of it.
In conclusion, Cypriots are only 40% Anatolian farmer, and are more post-Yamnaya CHG, Iran neolithic and Natufian than they are EEF, all populations that are the main basis of your hated modern MENA people.(
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...gid=2101783313) -Belgians- are more derived from EEFs than Cypriots are. Cypriots aren't the only "Europeans" with signficant amounts of non-EEF MENA admixture.
I don't know how someone can be on this forum, full of autistic genetictards for 7 yrs and still not know the basics, but you're welcome for the lesson.
Also, my sig is a Swedish lawyer showing his disdain for the primitive behaviour of a Middle-Eastern immigrant charged with murder.
Bookmarks