6
I've just returned from a wonderful trip to Scandinavian countries and, to continue the tradition of previous posts, I wanted to share my anthropological observations about natives living there.
First of all, between East Norwegians (Oslo), Swedes (Stockholm) and East Danes (Copenhagen) there is absolutely no difference. They are obviously the same ethnic group, speaking dialects of same language, separated by absurd borders...
Pigmentation:
- everyone appears to be light eyed
- children are almost all blonde (half being platinum blonde) or light brown haired
- adults are somewhat darker haired, but various shades of blonde predominate
Racial features:
- indigenous CM types (Baltid/Borreby) are strongly predominant, mostly in gracilized form
- a Corded variety (that came with Aryan invasion) always mixed with above follows next
There are barely any other elements: the population seems to be extraordinarily homogeneous...
Body constitution: tall and athletic, but heavy at the same time. Like in Israel, men look better than women but gap is smaller. Overall, girls don't look that good thanks to a high CM input: the average is decent, though, because most have some Corded admixture that makes their features finer. Men, on the other hand, are good looking but not masculine (thanks to gracilization).
West Norwegians (Bergen) are somewhat different by having, once in a while, a third element:
- Near Eastern types (Alpine, Dinaric, Med) that came during Neolithic
and a consistently higher Corded input. I've seen some that looked generic Aryan...
East Danes (Aarhus) are the most different from all, laying somewhere between North Germans and Scandinavians. They are very similar to English people and evenly varied between the three elements mentioned above. So they are significantly more brunet but at the same time better looking (when I was there 4 years ago, I remember much better looking girls). The majority of adults is definitely not blond...
Bookmarks