0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,458 Given: 7,646 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,306 Given: 1,198 |
Curupira was fully colonial from Minas Gerais and he was 99-100% European. He had a German ancestor, but from the 18th century (so colonial he).
I could find more examples if you want.
Brazil has heavy disparity between colonials, some colonial regions have less European admixture than others. Minas Gerais, for example, received 800.000 Portuguese settlers in the 18th century, other regions barely received large numbers of Portuguese. I'd say most of the European input in parts of Minas Gerais and Central Brazil is due to Colonial Portuguese settlers.
Here you can check that only Minas Gerais region received more Portuguese in one century than the whole Hispanic America received Spaniards from 16th to 18th centuries: https://journals.openedition.org/nuevomundo/63251
What we could discuss is if Mexico has the oldest 80%+ colonials, people living in America since the 16th century. I think it's very likely because before the 18th century Brazil hardly attracted Iberian settlers.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 195 Given: 2 |
If their Euro ancestry was of Anglo/German stock they'd look considerably more "Euro" Most of these look like dark Middle Eastern/Turkish.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 14,915 Given: 27,872 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,306 Given: 1,198 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 25,690 Given: 23,946 |
Uruguay is.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,306 Given: 1,198 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,458 Given: 7,646 |
he was not 99-100% European LOL
he also had recent European ancestors, one being from Germany
and an Amerindian mtdna
Find me a DNA result of those Mina Gerais with all colonial Portuguese ancestry who are over 80% EuropeanI could find more examples if you want.
Brazil has heavy disparity between colonials, some colonial regions have less European admixture than others. Minas Gerais, for example, received 800.000 Portuguese settlers in the 18th century, other regions barely received large numbers of Portuguese. I'd say most of the European input in parts of Minas Gerais and Central Brazil is due to Colonial Portuguese settlers.
Here you can check that only Minas Gerais region received more Portuguese in one century than the whole Hispanic America received Spaniards from 16th to 18th centuries: https://journals.openedition.org/nuevomundo/63251
then you can further proof what you are claiming is true
so far, all the Brazilians that are over 80% European that I have seen on 23andMe have recent European heritage and are never 100% of colonial background
the people I posted are all of 100% colonial backgroundWhat we could discuss is if Mexico has the oldest 80%+ colonials, people living in America since the 16th century. I think it's very likely because before the 18th century Brazil hardly attracted Iberian settlers.
this is why I made this thread because so far, I have only seen Mexican colonials with such high Euro admixture having no recent European ancestry
Colonial Mexicans are also the most diverse population of Latin America too
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,458 Given: 7,646 |
those people I posted have JEWISH ancestry because their areas was populated or founded by large Jewish families
they are not just of European background but also of Jewish colonial roots
they are not going to look European if you have been mixing with Jews for so long, those middle eastern traits will be conserved throughout generations and generations
One of the wealthiest families of Monterrey, they look very Jewish/Middle Eastern and they are of colonial background
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks