Studies on racial diversity in society and race mixing

[16coresCasual]

That is a lot of research.

I made a mistake and posted some sources twice. It starts with "Ethnocentrism is universal and likely evolved in origin" and ends with "The kinship between random co-ethnics can exceed that between grandparent and grandchild, kinship between members of an ethnic group is greater than expected" but they're next to each other so that shouldn't be a problem. Also some things can be debatable like BiDil medication. It was said that it was developed as a cheaper drug specifically for black americans and that it's not because of their race but because of economic reasons. Then again why would BiDil be prescribed specifically to blacks? It's either discrimination against other races or the medication itself and its components. But other arguments still stand.

By the way a lot of source links could be pulled by now but you could still probably find them by using archive sites. (archive.org ; archive.is etc)

[Kamal900]

I made a mistake and posted some sources twice. It starts with "Ethnocentrism is universal and likely evolved in origin" and ends with "The kinship between random co-ethnics can exceed that between grandparent and grandchild, kinship between members of an ethnic group is greater than expected" but they're next to each other so that shouldn't be a problem. Also some things can be debatable like BiDil medication. It was said that it was developed as a cheaper drug specifically for black americans and that it's not because of their race but because of economic reasons. Then again why would BiDil be prescribed specifically to blacks? It's either discrimination against other races or the medication itself and its components. But other arguments still stand.

By the way a lot of source links could be pulled by now but you could still probably find them by using archive sites. (archive.org ; archive.is etc)

It very well done. I'm going to subscribe this thread.

[Bandesha]

No matter how much you try, eventually diversity is going to take over in next 500 years all human will look like hybrids

[16coresCasual]

No matter how much you try, eventually diversity is going to take over in next 500 years all human will look like hybrids

well, if everyone looked like hybrids that wouldn't be very diverse, would it? But nah, it's more likely that in the next 500 years we will start changing some of our parts to robotic ones or something like that.
In fact it's more probable that a nuclear world war or ebola-like disease will wipe out a lot of people and when there's total chaos different groups tend to stick with their own kind.

[Smeagol]

Excellent Reference.

[21993]

“a White mother of mixed-race child would have more genetically in common with a random White person on the street than with her own child.”

This is most probably not true.

[KMack]

If I remember correctly white male / asian female couples dominate interracial statistics. At least in the United States. Those whites (and everyone in general) should drop their xenophilia and racial fetishes because lets be honest - a lot of those relationships are based on that. Not to say that there can't be genuine love and yeah yeah everyone can choose what to do.

A lot of it is because white bitches don't want to get married and have kids, especially the overly educated feminazi cunts.

[Aldaris]

“a White mother of mixed-race child would have more genetically in common with a random White person on the street than with her own child.”

This info saddened me for real. Just imagine that your baby is a part of you but both genetically and physically, you are much more related with other people..

I wouldn't use the phrase 'more related to' in this case, as I associate the meaning of that to be different than 'more closer genetically' - something more akin to how deep you'd have to go in order to find a last common ancestor. And in that case, the depth would be zero, even though the actual genetic distance would be large.

[16coresCasual]

Genetically speaking, almost all nations have formed as a result of racial mix. For instance, Italians are mainly a mixture Alpine, Dinaric and Mediterranean races in different proportions. Germans are mostly a mix of Alpine, Nordic and Dinaric races. Some might say all these types are European but anthropologically speaking, all these classifications are different races.

It's like a spectrum - some are more close to each other and some are more distant

[Aldaris]

Genetically speaking, almost all nations have formed as a result of racial mix. For instance, Italians are mainly a mixture Alpine, Dinaric and Mediterranean races in different proportions. Germans are mostly a mix of Alpine, Nordic and Dinaric races. Some might say all these types are European but anthropologically speaking, all these classifications are different races.

They are not different races in any sense, which would reflect an actual ancestry, they are just phenotypical categories, although there is some correlation with genetics. There were no basal populations exclusively made of alpines, dinarics, etc, the features of all these phenotypes were either present among proto-European populations (in different distributions, of course), or they've appeared independently among different populations later. What this shows us is that phenotype can be very misleading if you're tracing actual ancestry, consider that even siblings can have completely different features. Not that it is useless when taken as a large statistical data and early anthropologists have indeed made certain predictions, which turned out to be right, but they were still wrong about most things.