PHP Warning: Illegal string offset 'type' in ..../includes/class_postbit.php(345) : eval()'d code on line 113
Is Freudian Psychology a scientifically valid contribution to the Cognitive Sciences?
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Is Freudian Psychology a scientifically valid contribution to the Cognitive Sciences?

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Last Online
    10-22-2020 @ 12:02 AM
    Ethnicity
    Turk
    Country
    Flanders
    Y-DNA
    R1b-M269*
    mtDNA
    K1a19
    Gender
    Posts
    5,010
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,356
    Given: 1,612

    0 Not allowed!

    Default Is Freudian Psychology a scientifically valid contribution to the Cognitive Sciences?

    Freudian Psychology is based on the work of Sigmund Freud (1856-1939). He is the founder of Psychoanalysis and is credited with establishing the field of verbal psychotherapy. Freud is known for his theories of the unconscious mind, dreams, infantile sexuality, libido, repression, and transference, ego, and the superego.

    However, despite his acclaimed influence on psychology and psychotherapy, it seems that Freudian Psychology is criticized by many (Horgan, 2017) and is even considered to be pseudoscience.

    Is Freudian Psychology considered to be a scientifically valid approach?

  2. #2
    Malarxist-Bidenist
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Óttar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Last Online
    01-03-2022 @ 06:38 PM
    Location
    Chicago IL
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Germanic, Celtic
    Ethnicity
    Northwestern European-American
    Ancestry
    Great Britain (early 17th c.), Ireland (19th c.), Elsaß Germany (19th c.)
    Country
    United States
    Region
    Illinois
    Y-DNA
    I1
    mtDNA
    H
    Taxonomy
    Atlantic
    Politics
    Wählt Sozialdemokratisch! 🌹
    Hero
    Aldous Huxley
    Religion
    Hindu - Shakta (शाक्तं)
    Age
    35
    Gender
    Posts
    9,593
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 5,782
    Given: 5,353

    2 Not allowed!

    Default

    Yes. He may not have gotten everything right, and he has some strange theories (in Civilization And Its Discontents, he speculates about cavemen having contests pissing on camp-fires), but his work provided a firm foundation for the study of psychology. For the naysayers, it is much easier to point the finger and criticize something than to come up with a robust alternative.


    Only butthurted clowns minuses my posts. -- Лиссиы

  3. #3
    Ascending Roy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Last Online
    Today @ 09:40 AM
    Location
    Somewhere
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Slavic
    Ethnicity
    Polish
    Ancestry
    Polish and distant Ashkenazi Jewish.
    Country
    Poland
    Y-DNA
    E-V13 Shqiptar in disguise
    mtDNA
    U5a1a1 Hyperborean
    Taxonomy
    Moderately not ugly something
    Politics
    Social Liberalism - apparently.
    Hero
    Goofy
    Religion
    Agnostic
    Gender
    Posts
    28,707
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 20,605
    Given: 48,334

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    His theories on how our personality develops and how long it lasts is a bullshit.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Red Pill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Last Online
    03-05-2024 @ 12:08 AM
    Ethnicity
    White European
    Country
    European Union
    Politics
    Ethnopluralism
    Hero
    Harold Godwinson
    Religion
    Agnostic
    Gender
    Posts
    552
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 373
    Given: 193

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    I think Freud got a bad rep because of the association of psychoanalysis with Cultural Marxism. This is not however Freud's fault but some of his epigones' or other Marxist thinkers who tried to use some concepts from psychoanalysis to support their own theories. I'm rather skeptic about the effectiveness of psychoanalysis as a therapeutic tool but I think that Freud's basic concepts about the human mind are fundamentally sound. I don't think that Freudian ideas are so iconoclastic either (even if they may have been perceived so by some of his contemporaries who grew under a 'Victorian' sexual morality). For instance, what so iconoclastic and revolutionary with 'Lieben und Arbeiten'? Freud was to a big extent a positivist and not so far apart from the contemporary scientific environment. He was also strongly influenced by classic culture, which is evident in psychoanalysis terminology.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Long-lost Erotica of a Pre-Freudian Sexologist
    By Kazimiera in forum Sexuality
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-27-2019, 04:50 PM
  2. Replies: 30
    Last Post: 12-27-2018, 07:43 AM
  3. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 02-18-2017, 06:24 PM
  4. Freudian Slip? 'DC's Role is to Serve the Banks'
    By Smaland in forum United States
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-14-2010, 06:52 PM
  5. Gordon Brown and his Freudian Slip
    By Beorn in forum Off-topic
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-07-2009, 02:27 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •