0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,527 Given: 3,308 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 133 Given: 15 |
EEF existed for a very long time and mixed with various groups, obviously this affected their phenotype and e.g early Balkan farmers cannot be compared with WHG/EHG heavy later farmers from say Poland. Yamnaya wasn't darker than Anatolia_neolithic farmers and definitely not darker than Iberian farmers with their heavy WHG and even Magdalenian ancestry. I bet the steppe-like peoples living north of the Yamnaya horizon and with higher EHG were pretty light.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,196 Given: 2,515 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,343 Given: 3,478 |
Last edited by Samnium; 10-21-2019 at 08:14 PM.
"Allobroges vaillants ! Dans vos vertes campagnes,
Accordez-moi toujours asile et sûreté,
Car j'aime à respirer l'air pur de vos montagnes,
Je suis la Liberté ! la Liberté !"
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,527 Given: 3,308 |
Because farming population had diet that's less reliant on meat (source of Vitamin D) & more reliant on crops and vegetables. But I think only Globular Amphora EEF was lighter than Yamnaya. But I think Yamnaya was also very light skinned, but darker by modern Northern European standards.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,527 Given: 3,308 |
Both EHG and EEF (particulary Globular Amphora) were very light skinned because these populations possed light skin genes. I think we're only going to have endless argument with this lol. None of these population were particularly dark skinned. Among farmers, Iran_N was probably the darkest followed by PPNB. I would also say that CHG were also quite light skinned despite being very similar to Iran_N. Probably because they adapted differently than Iran_N farmers.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks