1
In the case of racially unmixed individuals, what is more important for determining which ethnicity or people one most belongs to, paternal line or majority ancestry? For the sake of discussion, let's leave out culture and residence and imagine an individual whose parents for whatever reason move from place to place and so he never resides in one particular locale long enough to take roots.
Now in many traditional societies and cultures ones paternal ancestry and surname is what determined ethnic or tribal affiliation. But what if the majority ones ancestry was something else? Let's say an 80-90% German or Polish person surnamed O'Reilly or a 80-90% Northern Italian with a paternal line from Finland.
Which takes precedence in your opinion? If you are of such a mixed heritage, what do you personally identify with?
Bookmarks